DHARAMDEV KUMAR YADAV ALIAS SAKALDEO YADAV vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 949/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2),111(3),111(4). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 12th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRGA010042922026
Filing Number
4096/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
949/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Gaya DJ Div.
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
863
Police Station
GAYA MUFASSIL
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DHARAMDEV KUMAR YADAV ALIAS SAKALDEO YADAV
Adv. RADHEKANT SHARMA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Dharamdev Kumar Yadav v. State of Bihar (A.B.P. 949/2026) The Sessions Court, Gaya dismissed Dharamdev Kumar Yadav's anticipatory bail petition in connection with charges under BNS sections 303(2), 317(2), 111(3), and 111(4) for alleged unauthorized sand transportation. The court found that the petitioner, as owner of the tractor used for transporting stolen sand, faced organized crime allegations and had prior criminal history in similar offences (Mufassil P.S. Case 238/2021), making him unsuitable for anticipatory bail given the gravity of charges and his antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Dharamdev Kumar Yadav v. State of Bihar (A.B.P. 949/2026) The Sessions Court, Gaya dismissed Dharamdev Kumar Yadav's anticipatory bail petition in connection with charges under BNS sections 303(2), 317(2), 111(3), and 111(4) for alleged unauthorized sand transportation. The court found that the petitioner, as owner of the tractor used for transporting stolen sand, faced organized crime allegations and had prior criminal history in similar offences (Mufassil P.S. Case 238/2021), making him unsuitable for anticipatory bail given the gravity of charges and his antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts