DHARAMDEV KUMAR YADAV ALIAS SAKALDEO YADAV vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 949/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2),111(3),111(4). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGA010042922026

Filing Number

4096/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

949/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Gaya DJ Div.

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

863

Police Station

GAYA MUFASSIL

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2),111(3),111(4)

Petitioner(s)

1.DHARAMDEV KUMAR YADAV ALIAS SAKALDEO YADAV

Adv. RADHEKANT SHARMA

Respondent(s)

1.STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
12-Mar-2026

OrderView PDF

Case Summary: Dharamdev Kumar Yadav v. State of Bihar (A.B.P. 949/2026) The Sessions Court, Gaya dismissed Dharamdev Kumar Yadav's anticipatory bail petition in connection with charges under BNS sections 303(2), 317(2), 111(3), and 111(4) for alleged unauthorized sand transportation. The court found that the petitioner, as owner of the tractor used for transporting stolen sand, faced organized crime allegations and had prior criminal history in similar offences (Mufassil P.S. Case 238/2021), making him unsuitable for anticipatory bail given the gravity of charges and his antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
12-Mar-2026

Disposed

Principal District and Sessions Judge
10-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 949/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Dharamdev Kumar Yadav v. State of Bihar (A.B.P. 949/2026) The Sessions Court, Gaya dismissed Dharamdev Kumar Yadav's anticipatory bail petition in connection with charges under BNS sections 303(2), 317(2), 111(3), and 111(4) for alleged unauthorized sand transportation. The court found that the petitioner, as owner of the tractor used for transporting stolen sand, faced organized crime allegations and had prior criminal history in similar offences (Mufassil P.S. Case 238/2021), making him unsuitable for anticipatory bail given the gravity of charges and his antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.