ADNAN KARIMI vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 946/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,351(2),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGA010042872026

Filing Number

4091/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

946/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Gaya DJ Div.

Judge

4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

349

Police Station

BUNIYAD GANJ

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,351(2),352,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ADNAN KARIMI

    Adv. DIWAKAR KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Adnan Karimi vs State of Bihar (A.B.P. No. 946/2026) The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Adnan Karimi's anticipatory bail petition in a firearms case arising from a land dispute incident on 15.12.2025. Though the petitioner had no criminal record, the court found specific allegations of firing with a pistol causing gunshot injuries, distinguishing his case from a co-accused who received bail. The court disposed the petition directing the petitioner to surrender before the trial court within one month for further proceedings on merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Bail Matters

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 946/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Adnan Karimi vs State of Bihar (A.B.P. No. 946/2026) The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Adnan Karimi's anticipatory bail petition in a firearms case arising from a land dispute incident on 15.12.2025. Though the petitioner had no criminal record, the court found specific allegations of firing with a pistol causing gunshot injuries, distinguishing his case from a co-accused who received bail. The court disposed the petition directing the petitioner to surrender before the trial court within one month for further proceedings on merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case