SUNIL YADAV AND OTHER vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 932/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(1),109(1),303(2),351(2),351(3),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRGA010042192026
Filing Number
4024/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
932/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
Gaya DJ Div.
Judge
5-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 18-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
290
Police Station
MAGADH VISWAVIDYALAY
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUNIL YADAV AND OTHER
Adv. SITENDRA KUMAR YADAV
-
2.ARJUN YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The Additional Sessions Judge, Gaya granted anticipatory bail to Sunil Yadav and Arjun Yadav in a case involving assault and extortion related to agricultural land. The court found that no offense was substantiated under Sections 303(2) of BNS and 27 of Arms Act, the injuries were simple in nature, and the accused had no criminal antecedents, warranting bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
16-Apr-2026
Bail Matters
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
04-Apr-2026
Bail Matters
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
25-Mar-2026
Bail Matters
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
13-Mar-2026
Bail Matters
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 932/2026
The Additional Sessions Judge, Gaya granted anticipatory bail to Sunil Yadav and Arjun Yadav in a case involving assault and extortion related to agricultural land. The court found that no offense was substantiated under Sections 303(2) of BNS and 27 of Arms Act, the injuries were simple in nature, and the accused had no criminal antecedents, warranting bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts