RAVI KUMAR ALIAS RAVI PASWAN vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 444/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),303(2),308(3),308(4),329(4),111(2)(b),111(3),111(4),112(1),112(2),351(2),61(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 23rd March 2026.

Regular Bail

CNR: BRGA010042152026

Case disposed

Filing Number

4020/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

444/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

Gaya DJ Div.

Judge

5-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

FIR Details

FIR Number

825

Police Station

FATEHPUR

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),303(2),308(3),308(4),329(4),111(2)(b),111(3),111(4),112(1),112(2),351(2),61(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

RAVI KUMAR ALIAS RAVI PASWAN

Adv. JUHI

Respondent(s)

STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA

Hearing History

Judge: 5-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

23-03-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

BAIL MATTERS

13-03-2026

BAIL MATTERS

11-03-2026

BAIL MATTERS

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
Order

The Additional Sessions Judge-II, Gaya rejected the bail petition of Ravi Kumar Paswan, finding the allegations against him and co-accused to be serious, involving organized crime, robbery, extortion, and firearm use in a sand mining dispute. The court considered the gravity of charges—including forcible sand theft, demanding ransom money, assault, and firing at a vehicle—along with the accused's prior criminal record, as sufficient grounds to deny bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge-II, Gaya rejected the bail petition of Ravi Kumar Paswan, finding the allegations against him and co-accused to be serious, involving organized crime, robbery, extortion, and firearm use in a sand mining dispute. The court considered the gravity of charges—including forcible sand theft, demanding ransom money, assault, and firing at a vehicle—along with the accused's prior criminal record, as sufficient grounds to deny bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Gaya DJ Div. All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case