MANOJ CHAUDHARY vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 442/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),238. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRGA010042012026

Filing Number

4008/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

442/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Gaya DJ Div.

Judge

23-District and Additional Sessions Judge- XVI

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 18-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

3

Police Station

Neemchak Bathani

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),238

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANOJ CHAUDHARY

    Adv. RAJEEV KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the bail petition of Manoj Chaudhary, who is accused of murder (u/s 103(1), 238 BNS) in connection with an unidentified woman's death discovered in a trench. The court held that despite the petitioner having no criminal antecedent, the serious nature of the offense and the fact that his name emerged from the co-accused's confessional statement, with investigation still pending, warranted denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge- XVI

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Bail Matters

    District and Additional Sessions Judge- XVI

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Bail Matters

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 442/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the bail petition of Manoj Chaudhary, who is accused of murder (u/s 103(1), 238 BNS) in connection with an unidentified woman's death discovered in a trench. The court held that despite the petitioner having no criminal antecedent, the serious nature of the offense and the fact that his name emerged from the co-accused's confessional statement, with investigation still pending, warranted denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case