MD. PARWEZ ALAM vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH — 441/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4),310(2),308,351,61,198,115(2),126(2),120,201. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRGA010041952026

Filing Number

4002/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

441/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Gaya DJ Div.

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 18-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

334

Police Station

RLY PATNA GAYA JN

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4),310(2),308,351,61,198,115(2),126(2),120,201

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD. PARWEZ ALAM

    Adv. VISHAL KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Sessions Judge dismissed Md. Parwez Alam's bail application in a gold smuggling and train loot case. The court found that unlike co-accused who received bail, Parwez Alam was directly implicated in the offense with multiple witness statements confirming his active participation in the loot, gold processing, and intimidation of co-accused persons. Given the serious nature of the allegations and grave charges, the court deemed bail inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Bail Matters

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 441/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Sessions Judge dismissed Md. Parwez Alam's bail application in a gold smuggling and train loot case. The court found that unlike co-accused who received bail, Parwez Alam was directly implicated in the offense with multiple witness statements confirming his active participation in the loot, gold processing, and intimidation of co-accused persons. Given the serious nature of the allegations and grave charges, the court deemed bail inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case