PRAMOD SHARMA ALIAS PRAMOD KUMAR SHARMA AND OTHERS vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 910/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),303(2),125,324(4),351(2),352,117(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGA010041182026

Filing Number

3927/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

910/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Gaya DJ Div.

Judge

5-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

8

Police Station

GAYA MUFASSIL

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),303(2),125,324(4),351(2),352,117(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRAMOD SHARMA ALIAS PRAMOD KUMAR SHARMA AND OTHERS

    Adv. DILIP KUMAR PANDEY

  2. 2.NIKESH SHARMA

  3. 3.HINA SHARMA

  4. 4.SHOBHA SHARMA

  5. 5.NIKKI KUMARI

  6. 6.RANI SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Additional Sessions Judge-II, Gaya granted anticipatory bail to six accused petitioners in a case involving allegations of assault, abuse, and theft. The court found that the allegations were general and omnibus in nature, a counter-case existed, no criminal antecedents were reported, and no incriminating material was found against the petitioners, warranting bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 910/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge-II, Gaya granted anticipatory bail to six accused petitioners in a case involving allegations of assault, abuse, and theft. The court found that the allegations were general and omnibus in nature, a counter-case existed, no criminal antecedents were reported, and no incriminating material was found against the petitioners, warranting bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case