JAI KUMAR ALIAS JAI PRAKASH KUMAR AND OTHER vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 905/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109(1),352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRGA010041112026
Filing Number
3921/2026
Filing Date
07-Mar-2026
Registration No
905/2026
Registration Date
07-Mar-2026
Court
Gaya DJ Div.
Judge
5-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 07-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
246
Police Station
Mahkar
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAI KUMAR ALIAS JAI PRAKASH KUMAR AND OTHER
Adv. BAWAN KUMAR
-
2.ABHIMANYU KUMAR ALIAS MANNU KUMAR
-
3.ANKIT KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The Additional Sessions Judge-II, Gaya granted anticipatory bail to the three accused petitioners charged with offences under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2), and 3(5). The court relied on the fact that the co-accused's bail had already been granted by the High Court, the informant's injuries were found to be simple in nature, and the petitioners had no criminal antecedents. The accused were required to furnish a bail bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
18-Mar-2026
Bail Matters
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
12-Mar-2026
Bail Matters
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 905/2026
The Additional Sessions Judge-II, Gaya granted anticipatory bail to the three accused petitioners charged with offences under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2), and 3(5). The court relied on the fact that the co-accused's bail had already been granted by the High Court, the informant's injuries were found to be simple in nature, and the petitioners had no criminal antecedents. The accused were required to furnish a bail bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts