JAI KUMAR ALIAS JAI PRAKASH KUMAR AND OTHER vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 905/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109(1),352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGA010041112026

Case disposed

Filing Number

3921/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

905/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

Gaya DJ Div.

Judge

5-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

246

Police Station

Mahkar

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109(1),352,351(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

JAI KUMAR ALIAS JAI PRAKASH KUMAR AND OTHER

Adv. BAWAN KUMAR

ABHIMANYU KUMAR ALIAS MANNU KUMAR

ANKIT KUMAR

Respondent(s)

STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA

Hearing History

Judge: 5-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

01-04-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

BAIL MATTERS

12-03-2026

BAIL MATTERS

10-03-2026

BAIL MATTERS

Final Orders / Judgements

01-04-2026
Order

The Additional Sessions Judge-II, Gaya granted anticipatory bail to the three accused petitioners charged with offences under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2), and 3(5). The court relied on the fact that the co-accused's bail had already been granted by the High Court, the informant's injuries were found to be simple in nature, and the petitioners had no criminal antecedents. The accused were required to furnish a bail bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge-II, Gaya granted anticipatory bail to the three accused petitioners charged with offences under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2), and 3(5). The court relied on the fact that the co-accused's bail had already been granted by the High Court, the informant's injuries were found to be simple in nature, and the petitioners had no criminal antecedents. The accused were required to furnish a bail bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Gaya DJ Div. All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case