SWARUP SINGH BHOKTA ALIAS SWAROOP SINGH vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH — 14/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8(b),18,29. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

ABP SPL NDPS COURT

CNR: BRGA010041082026

Filing Number

3918/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

14/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Gaya DJ Div.

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

23

Police Station

BARACHATTY

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8(b),18,29

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SWARUP SINGH BHOKTA ALIAS SWAROOP SINGH

    Adv. MUKESH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    SUMMARY The Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, NDPS Act, Gaya dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Swarup Singh Bhokta in connection with allegations of large-scale opium cultivation under Sections 8(b), 18, and 29 of the NDPS Act. The court rejected the petitioner's claims of false implication due to village politics and no criminal antecedents, finding that the serious nature of the contraband allegations and ongoing investigation warranted denial of this special privilege. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Bail Matters

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 14/2026

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, NDPS Act, Gaya dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Swarup Singh Bhokta in connection with allegations of large-scale opium cultivation under Sections 8(b), 18, and 29 of the NDPS Act. The court rejected the petitioner's claims of false implication due to village politics and no criminal antecedents, finding that the serious nature of the contraband allegations and ongoing investigation warranted denial of this special privilege. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case