ASHOK SINGH BHOKTA AND OTHER vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH — 824/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8(b),18(b),24,29(a). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application Spl. Act - CRI. BAIL APPLN.

CNR: BRGA010040532026

Filing Number

3863/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

824/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Gaya DJ Div.

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

15

Police Station

Lutua

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8(b),18(b),24,29(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK SINGH BHOKTA AND OTHER

    Adv. KALINNDRA MISHRA

  2. 2.ASHOK SINGH BHOKTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge allowed the bail petition of Ashok Singh Bhokta and another, who were arrested under NDPS Act Sections 8(b), 18(b), 24, and 29(a) for alleged opium cultivation on forest land. The court found merit in the petitioners' contention that no incriminating material was recovered from their possession and they had no connection to the cultivation site, ordering their release on bail of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Bail Matters

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 824/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge allowed the bail petition of Ashok Singh Bhokta and another, who were arrested under NDPS Act Sections 8(b), 18(b), 24, and 29(a) for alleged opium cultivation on forest land. The court found merit in the petitioners' contention that no incriminating material was recovered from their possession and they had no connection to the cultivation site, ordering their release on bail of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case