NITU DEVI AND OTHER vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 896/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),303(2),74,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRGA010040412026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3851/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
896/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
Gaya DJ Div.
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
598
Police Station
KONCH
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NITU DEVI AND OTHER
Adv. KAMLESH KUMAR SINGH
VINAY SINGH
Respondent(s)
STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Sessions Judge, Gayaji granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Nitu Devi and Vinay Singh in connection with Konch P.S. Case No. 598/2025 involving charges under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 74, and 3(5). The court found the petitioners' submission reasonable, noting the dispute stemmed from a petty children's altercation between neighboring families with an ongoing land dispute, minimal injuries, no criminal antecedents, and counter-registration of cases. The petitioners were directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount each within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Sessions Judge, Gayaji granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Nitu Devi and Vinay Singh in connection with Konch P.S. Case No. 598/2025 involving charges under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 74, and 3(5). The court found the petitioners' submission reasonable, noting the dispute stemmed from a petty children's altercation between neighboring families with an ongoing land dispute, minimal injuries, no criminal antecedents, and counter-registration of cases. The petitioners were directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount each within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts