PRASANT KUMAR ALIAS PRASHANT MANI AND OTHER vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 885/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRGA010039282026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3741/2026
Filing Date
28-02-2026
Registration No
885/2026
Registration Date
28-02-2026
Court
Gaya DJ Div.
Judge
5-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
49
Police Station
Kotwali
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRASANT KUMAR ALIAS PRASHANT MANI AND OTHER
Adv. RAJEEV KUMAR SINGH
RISHABH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA
Hearing History
Judge: 5-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
Disposed
BAIL MATTERS
BAIL MATTERS
BAIL MATTERS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | BAIL MATTERS | |
| 09-03-2026 | BAIL MATTERS | |
| 06-03-2026 | BAIL MATTERS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge-II, Gaya granted anticipatory bail to two young accused students (aged 20-22) charged with firearm offenses under Sections 109, 352, 3(5) of BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The court found that the informant was uncertain about the accused's identity, parties had reached a compromise, no injury occurred, and the FIR was based on misunderstanding; the court prioritized the petitioners' youth and future prospects as students preparing for competitive exams. The petitioners must appear before the trial court within one month and furnish bail bonds of Rs 10,000 each with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge-II, Gaya granted anticipatory bail to two young accused students (aged 20-22) charged with firearm offenses under Sections 109, 352, 3(5) of BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The court found that the informant was uncertain about the accused's identity, parties had reached a compromise, no injury occurred, and the FIR was based on misunderstanding; the court prioritized the petitioners' youth and future prospects as students preparing for competitive exams. The petitioners must appear before the trial court within one month and furnish bail bonds of Rs 10,000 each with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts