PRASANT KUMAR ALIAS PRASHANT MANI AND OTHER vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 885/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGA010039282026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

3741/2026

Filing Date

28-02-2026

Registration No

885/2026

Registration Date

28-02-2026

Court

Gaya DJ Div.

Judge

5-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

49

Police Station

Kotwali

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,352,3(5)
Arms Act Section 27

Petitioner(s)

PRASANT KUMAR ALIAS PRASHANT MANI AND OTHER

Adv. RAJEEV KUMAR SINGH

RISHABH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA

Hearing History

Judge: 5-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

13-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

BAIL MATTERS

09-03-2026

BAIL MATTERS

06-03-2026

BAIL MATTERS

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order

Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge-II, Gaya granted anticipatory bail to two young accused students (aged 20-22) charged with firearm offenses under Sections 109, 352, 3(5) of BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The court found that the informant was uncertain about the accused's identity, parties had reached a compromise, no injury occurred, and the FIR was based on misunderstanding; the court prioritized the petitioners' youth and future prospects as students preparing for competitive exams. The petitioners must appear before the trial court within one month and furnish bail bonds of Rs 10,000 each with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge-II, Gaya granted anticipatory bail to two young accused students (aged 20-22) charged with firearm offenses under Sections 109, 352, 3(5) of BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The court found that the informant was uncertain about the accused's identity, parties had reached a compromise, no injury occurred, and the FIR was based on misunderstanding; the court prioritized the petitioners' youth and future prospects as students preparing for competitive exams. The petitioners must appear before the trial court within one month and furnish bail bonds of Rs 10,000 each with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Gaya DJ Div. All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case