RAMJEET KUMAR ALIAS LEDHA vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH — 125/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 408. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.
Criminal Mislaneous
CNR: BRGA010039032026
Filing Number
3719/2026
Filing Date
28-Feb-2026
Registration No
125/2026
Registration Date
28-Feb-2026
Court
Gaya DJ Div.
Judge
4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 18-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
180
Police Station
BODHGAYA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMJEET KUMAR ALIAS LEDHA
Adv. RANJEET LAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary: The Court of Additional Sessions Judge-I, Gaya allowed applicant Ramjeet Kumar's miscellaneous application for extension of time to surrender and furnish bail bond in connection with Bodh Gaya P.S. Case No. 180/2025. The applicant was granted an additional 15 days from March 25, 2026 to surrender before the trial court and furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, as he had failed to comply with the original 30-day deadline due to being outside the state for livelihood purposes. All other conditions of the anticipatory bail remain unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 125/2026
Summary: The Court of Additional Sessions Judge-I, Gaya allowed applicant Ramjeet Kumar's miscellaneous application for extension of time to surrender and furnish bail bond in connection with Bodh Gaya P.S. Case No. 180/2025. The applicant was granted an additional 15 days from March 25, 2026 to surrender before the trial court and furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, as he had failed to comply with the original 30-day deadline due to being outside the state for livelihood purposes. All other conditions of the anticipatory bail remain unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts