CHANDRIKA RAVI DAS AND OTHERS vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 802/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(4),191(2),190,126(2),115(2),110,352,351(2),74,303(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGA010035362026

Case disposed

Filing Number

3359/2026

Filing Date

23-02-2026

Registration No

802/2026

Registration Date

23-02-2026

Court

Gaya DJ Div.

Judge

4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

53

Police Station

Vishnupad

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(4),191(2),190,126(2),115(2),110,352,351(2),74,303(2)

Petitioner(s)

CHANDRIKA RAVI DAS AND OTHERS

Adv. MANOJ KUMAR

GUDDU KUMAR

MUNI DEVI ALIAS MUNI KUMARI

FULWA DEVI ALIAS FULA DEVI

RAMPATIYA DEVI ALIAS RAMAPATI DEVI

RAJU DAS ALIAS RAJU RAVIDAS

DURGA RAVI DAS ALIAS DURGA RAM

KAVITA DEVI

Respondent(s)

STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA

Hearing History

Judge: 4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

11-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

BAIL MATTERS

27-02-2026

BAIL MATTERS

25-02-2026

BAIL MATTERS

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Order

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to eight petitioners accused of assault and witchcraft-related offenses under BNS sections 329(4), 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 110, 352, 351(2), 74, and 303(2). The court's decision was primarily based on the fact that both parties had compromised the case outside court, with the informant and injured persons present in court confirming the settlement. The petitioners were released on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of equal amount each, subject to conditions under BNSS section 482. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to eight petitioners accused of assault and witchcraft-related offenses under BNS sections 329(4), 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 110, 352, 351(2), 74, and 303(2). The court's decision was primarily based on the fact that both parties had compromised the case outside court, with the informant and injured persons present in court confirming the settlement. The petitioners were released on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of equal amount each, subject to conditions under BNSS section 482. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Gaya DJ Div. All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case