CHANDRIKA RAVI DAS AND OTHERS vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 802/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(4),191(2),190,126(2),115(2),110,352,351(2),74,303(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRGA010035362026
Filing Number
3359/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
802/2026
Registration Date
23-02-2026
Court
Gaya DJ Div.
Judge
4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
53
Police Station
Vishnupad
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHANDRIKA RAVI DAS AND OTHERS
Adv. MANOJ KUMAR
GUDDU KUMAR
MUNI DEVI ALIAS MUNI KUMARI
FULWA DEVI ALIAS FULA DEVI
RAMPATIYA DEVI ALIAS RAMAPATI DEVI
RAJU DAS ALIAS RAJU RAVIDAS
DURGA RAVI DAS ALIAS DURGA RAM
KAVITA DEVI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
Disposed
BAIL MATTERS
BAIL MATTERS
BAIL MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | BAIL MATTERS |
| 27-02-2026 | BAIL MATTERS |
| 25-02-2026 | BAIL MATTERS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to eight petitioners accused of assault and witchcraft-related offenses under BNS sections 329(4), 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 110, 352, 351(2), 74, and 303(2). The court's decision was primarily based on the fact that both parties had compromised the case outside court, with the informant and injured persons present in court confirming the settlement. The petitioners were released on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of equal amount each, subject to conditions under BNSS section 482. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to eight petitioners accused of assault and witchcraft-related offenses under BNS sections 329(4), 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 110, 352, 351(2), 74, and 303(2). The court's decision was primarily based on the fact that both parties had compromised the case outside court, with the informant and injured persons present in court confirming the settlement. The petitioners were released on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of equal amount each, subject to conditions under BNSS section 482. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts