CHANDRIKA RAVI DAS AND OTHERS vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 802/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(4),191(2),190,126(2),115(2),110,352,351(2),74,303(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRGA010035362026
Filing Number
3359/2026
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
802/2026
Registration Date
23-Feb-2026
Court
Gaya DJ Div.
Judge
4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 07-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
53
Police Station
Vishnupad
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHANDRIKA RAVI DAS AND OTHERS
Adv. MANOJ KUMAR
-
2.GUDDU KUMAR
-
3.MUNI DEVI ALIAS MUNI KUMARI
-
4.FULWA DEVI ALIAS FULA DEVI
-
5.RAMPATIYA DEVI ALIAS RAMAPATI DEVI
-
6.RAJU DAS ALIAS RAJU RAVIDAS
-
7.DURGA RAVI DAS ALIAS DURGA RAM
-
8.KAVITA DEVI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to eight petitioners accused of assault and witchcraft-related offenses under BNS sections 329(4), 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 110, 352, 351(2), 74, and 303(2). The court's decision was primarily based on the fact that both parties had compromised the case outside court, with the informant and injured persons present in court confirming the settlement. The petitioners were released on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of equal amount each, subject to conditions under BNSS section 482. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
10-Mar-2026
Bail Matters
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
27-Feb-2026
Bail Matters
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 802/2026
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to eight petitioners accused of assault and witchcraft-related offenses under BNS sections 329(4), 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 110, 352, 351(2), 74, and 303(2). The court's decision was primarily based on the fact that both parties had compromised the case outside court, with the informant and injured persons present in court confirming the settlement. The petitioners were released on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of equal amount each, subject to conditions under BNSS section 482. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts