BIGU DAS ALIAS BIGU RAM AND OTHERS vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 800/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109(1),329(4),76,303(2),351(3),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGA010035332026

Case disposed

Filing Number

3356/2026

Filing Date

23-02-2026

Registration No

800/2026

Registration Date

23-02-2026

Court

Gaya DJ Div.

Judge

4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

37

Police Station

Vishnupad

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109(1),329(4),76,303(2),351(3),352,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

BIGU DAS ALIAS BIGU RAM AND OTHERS

Adv. ANIL KUMAR VERMA

DEEPAK KUMAR

PRAKASH KUMAR ALIAS ANTESH KUMAR

MANU DAS @ ALOK RAJ

KIRAN DEVI

RAKHI KUMARI

Respondent(s)

STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA

Hearing History

Judge: 4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

11-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

BAIL MATTERS

27-02-2026

BAIL MATTERS

25-02-2026

BAIL MATTERS

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Order

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Gaya granted anticipatory bail to six petitioners (Bigu Das and others) accused of assault, attempted outrage of modesty, and theft under various BNS sections. The court's decision was primarily based on the fact that both parties had compromised the case outside court, the informant admitted to the compromise and endorsed signatures on the order sheet, and the petitioners had no criminal antecedents. The petitioners were directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each upon arrest or surrender within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Gaya granted anticipatory bail to six petitioners (Bigu Das and others) accused of assault, attempted outrage of modesty, and theft under various BNS sections. The court's decision was primarily based on the fact that both parties had compromised the case outside court, the informant admitted to the compromise and endorsed signatures on the order sheet, and the petitioners had no criminal antecedents. The petitioners were directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each upon arrest or surrender within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Gaya DJ Div. All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case