BIGU DAS ALIAS BIGU RAM AND OTHERS vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 800/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109(1),329(4),76,303(2),351(3),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRGA010035332026
Filing Number
3356/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
800/2026
Registration Date
23-02-2026
Court
Gaya DJ Div.
Judge
4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
37
Police Station
Vishnupad
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BIGU DAS ALIAS BIGU RAM AND OTHERS
Adv. ANIL KUMAR VERMA
DEEPAK KUMAR
PRAKASH KUMAR ALIAS ANTESH KUMAR
MANU DAS @ ALOK RAJ
KIRAN DEVI
RAKHI KUMARI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
Disposed
BAIL MATTERS
BAIL MATTERS
BAIL MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | BAIL MATTERS |
| 27-02-2026 | BAIL MATTERS |
| 25-02-2026 | BAIL MATTERS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Gaya granted anticipatory bail to six petitioners (Bigu Das and others) accused of assault, attempted outrage of modesty, and theft under various BNS sections. The court's decision was primarily based on the fact that both parties had compromised the case outside court, the informant admitted to the compromise and endorsed signatures on the order sheet, and the petitioners had no criminal antecedents. The petitioners were directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each upon arrest or surrender within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Gaya granted anticipatory bail to six petitioners (Bigu Das and others) accused of assault, attempted outrage of modesty, and theft under various BNS sections. The court's decision was primarily based on the fact that both parties had compromised the case outside court, the informant admitted to the compromise and endorsed signatures on the order sheet, and the petitioners had no criminal antecedents. The petitioners were directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each upon arrest or surrender within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts