BIGU DAS ALIAS BIGU RAM AND OTHERS vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 800/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109(1),329(4),76,303(2),351(3),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRGA010035332026
Filing Number
3356/2026
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
800/2026
Registration Date
23-Feb-2026
Court
Gaya DJ Div.
Judge
4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 07-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
37
Police Station
Vishnupad
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BIGU DAS ALIAS BIGU RAM AND OTHERS
Adv. ANIL KUMAR VERMA
-
2.DEEPAK KUMAR
-
3.PRAKASH KUMAR ALIAS ANTESH KUMAR
-
4.MANU DAS @ ALOK RAJ
-
5.KIRAN DEVI
-
6.RAKHI KUMARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Gaya granted anticipatory bail to six petitioners (Bigu Das and others) accused of assault, attempted outrage of modesty, and theft under various BNS sections. The court's decision was primarily based on the fact that both parties had compromised the case outside court, the informant admitted to the compromise and endorsed signatures on the order sheet, and the petitioners had no criminal antecedents. The petitioners were directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each upon arrest or surrender within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
10-Mar-2026
Bail Matters
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
27-Feb-2026
Bail Matters
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 800/2026
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Gaya granted anticipatory bail to six petitioners (Bigu Das and others) accused of assault, attempted outrage of modesty, and theft under various BNS sections. The court's decision was primarily based on the fact that both parties had compromised the case outside court, the informant admitted to the compromise and endorsed signatures on the order sheet, and the petitioners had no criminal antecedents. The petitioners were directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each upon arrest or surrender within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts