STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH SURESH RAZAK vs Kamlesh Yadav Advocate - Kumar Raushan Singh — 5/2022
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8(b),18/29. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
NDPS. S. CASE
CNR: BRGA010035192022
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
3513/2022
Filing Date
25-04-2022
Registration No
5/2022
Registration Date
26-04-2022
Court
Gaya DJ Div.
Judge
4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
FIR Details
FIR Number
73
Police Station
BARACHATTY
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH SURESH RAZAK
Adv. SADULLHA FAROOQUE
Respondent(s)
Kamlesh Yadav Advocate - Kumar Raushan Singh
Chalitar Singh
MUESHWAR SINGH(Absconding)
CHAITU SINGH(Absconding)
NEM DHARI SINGH(Absconding)
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 10-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 23-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 14-10-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 21-08-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: Both bail petitions filed by Kamlesh Yadav and Chalitar Singh in an NDPS case involving illegal opium cultivation on 4.4 acres of land have been rejected. The court found the offence serious and comparable to drug trafficking, and declined to enlarge the petitioners on bail given the vast cultivation area involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: Both bail petitions filed by Kamlesh Yadav and Chalitar Singh in an NDPS case involving illegal opium cultivation on 4.4 acres of land have been rejected. The court found the offence serious and comparable to drug trafficking, and declined to enlarge the petitioners on bail given the vast cultivation area involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts