SONU DAS ALIAS SONU KUMAR vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 364/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,201,304(B),34. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 20th April 2026.

Regular Bail

CNR: BRGA010035152026

Case disposed

Filing Number

3340/2026

Filing Date

23-02-2026

Registration No

364/2026

Registration Date

23-02-2026

Court

Gaya DJ Div.

Judge

4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

20th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

FIR Details

FIR Number

70

Police Station

Men

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 302,201,304(B),34

Petitioner(s)

SONU DAS ALIAS SONU KUMAR

Adv. KUMARI BASANTI

Respondent(s)

STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA

Hearing History

Judge: 4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

20-04-2026

Disposed

08-04-2026

BAIL MATTERS

23-03-2026

BAIL MATTERS

10-03-2026

BAIL MATTERS

27-02-2026

BAIL MATTERS

Final Orders / Judgements

20-04-2026
Order

Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge-I, Gaya rejected the bail petition of Sonu Das, who is accused of causing the dowry death of his wife under IPC sections 302, 201, and 304(B). The court found sufficient direct allegations, supporting witness statements, and circumstantial evidence (including call records showing post-crime movements) against the petitioner, and noted that his anticipatory bail had already been rejected by both the lower court and High Court, Patna. Given the serious and grave nature of the allegations and ongoing investigation, the bail was denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge-I, Gaya rejected the bail petition of Sonu Das, who is accused of causing the dowry death of his wife under IPC sections 302, 201, and 304(B). The court found sufficient direct allegations, supporting witness statements, and circumstantial evidence (including call records showing post-crime movements) against the petitioner, and noted that his anticipatory bail had already been rejected by both the lower court and High Court, Patna. Given the serious and grave nature of the allegations and ongoing investigation, the bail was denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Gaya DJ Div. All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case