RAUSHAN KUMAR ALIAS BITTU AND OTHER vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 772/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),127(2),115(2),303(2),76,109,352,351(3),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRGA010033882026
Filing Number
3221/2026
Filing Date
20-Feb-2026
Registration No
772/2026
Registration Date
20-Feb-2026
Court
Gaya DJ Div.
Judge
4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 18-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
142
Police Station
Panchanpur
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAUSHAN KUMAR ALIAS BITTU AND OTHER
Adv. RANJAN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
-
2.PANKAJ KUMAR
-
3.SURENDRA YADAV
-
4.DEEPAK KUMAR
-
5.RANJEET KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court granted anticipatory bail to the five petitioners in a case involving charges of assault and criminal intimidation. The judge found that the Investigation Officer had initially determined the case was not true against the petitioners, injuries were simple in nature, similar co-accused had already been granted bail, and the petitioners had clean criminal records. The petitioners were directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
11-Mar-2026
Bail Matters
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
02-Mar-2026
Bail Matters
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
25-Feb-2026
Bail Matters
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
23-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 772/2026
The court granted anticipatory bail to the five petitioners in a case involving charges of assault and criminal intimidation. The judge found that the Investigation Officer had initially determined the case was not true against the petitioners, injuries were simple in nature, similar co-accused had already been granted bail, and the petitioners had clean criminal records. The petitioners were directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts