RAUSHAN KUMAR ALIAS BITTU AND OTHER vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 772/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),127(2),115(2),303(2),76,109,352,351(3),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGA010033882026

Case disposed

Filing Number

3221/2026

Filing Date

20-02-2026

Registration No

772/2026

Registration Date

20-02-2026

Court

Gaya DJ Div.

Judge

4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

142

Police Station

Panchanpur

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),127(2),115(2),303(2),76,109,352,351(3),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

RAUSHAN KUMAR ALIAS BITTU AND OTHER

Adv. RANJAN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA

PANKAJ KUMAR

SURENDRA YADAV

DEEPAK KUMAR

RANJEET KUMAR

Respondent(s)

STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA

Hearing History

Judge: 4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

13-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

BAIL MATTERS

02-03-2026

BAIL MATTERS

25-02-2026

BAIL MATTERS

23-02-2026

BAIL MATTERS

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order

The court granted anticipatory bail to the five petitioners in a case involving charges of assault and criminal intimidation. The judge found that the Investigation Officer had initially determined the case was not true against the petitioners, injuries were simple in nature, similar co-accused had already been granted bail, and the petitioners had clean criminal records. The petitioners were directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to the five petitioners in a case involving charges of assault and criminal intimidation. The judge found that the Investigation Officer had initially determined the case was not true against the petitioners, injuries were simple in nature, similar co-accused had already been granted bail, and the petitioners had clean criminal records. The petitioners were directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Gaya DJ Div. All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case