BIKKU YADAV AND OTHERS vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH — 742/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),190,126(2),115(2),308(3),109,61(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 15th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRGA010032702026
Filing Number
3107/2026
Filing Date
19-Feb-2026
Registration No
742/2026
Registration Date
19-Feb-2026
Court
Gaya DJ Div.
Judge
5-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 18-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
22
Police Station
MAGADH M COLLEGE
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BIKKU YADAV AND OTHERS
Adv. VISHNU KANT MISHRA
-
2.RANJEET YADAV
-
3.SUMIT KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The Court of Additional Sessions Judge-II, Gaya rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by three accused (Bikku Yadav, Ranjeet Yadav, and Sumit Kumar) who were charged with ransom extortion, assault with weapons, and causing serious injuries. The court found credible evidence including victim corroboration, witness support, and injury reports showing head and nose wounds from a pistol butt assault, making the charges serious enough to deny bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
02-Apr-2026
Bail Matters
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
23-Mar-2026
Bail Matters
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
11-Mar-2026
Bail Matters
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
24-Feb-2026
Bail Matters
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
21-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 742/2026
Summary The Court of Additional Sessions Judge-II, Gaya rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by three accused (Bikku Yadav, Ranjeet Yadav, and Sumit Kumar) who were charged with ransom extortion, assault with weapons, and causing serious injuries. The court found credible evidence including victim corroboration, witness support, and injury reports showing head and nose wounds from a pistol butt assault, making the charges serious enough to deny bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts