MOHIT AGARWAL ALIAS GOLLU vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 317/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4),310(2),308,351,61,198,115(2),126(2),120,201. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 19th March 2026.

Regular Bail

CNR: BRGA010031232026

Case disposed

Filing Number

2966/2026

Filing Date

17-02-2026

Registration No

317/2026

Registration Date

17-02-2026

Court

Gaya DJ Div.

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

19th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

334

Police Station

RLY PATNA GAYA JN

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4),310(2),308,351,61,198,115(2),126(2),120,201

Petitioner(s)

MOHIT AGARWAL ALIAS GOLLU

Adv. ASHOK KUMAR

Respondent(s)

STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

19-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

BAIL MATTERS

28-02-2026

BAIL MATTERS

21-02-2026

BAIL MATTERS

19-02-2026

BAIL MATTERS

Final Orders / Judgements

19-03-2026
Order

Case Summary: Mohit Agarwal @ Golu vs. State of Bihar (B.P. No. 317/2026) The Sessions Judge granted bail to Mohit Agarwal, accused in a gold snatching case, finding only suspicion against him rather than direct evidence. The court noted that while other co-accused had clear involvement, materials against the petitioner were insufficient—his name emerged solely from mobile connectivity with another person, the victim's allegations targeted different individuals, and crucial statements were missing from the case diary. The judge balanced individual liberty against prosecution interests and released him on Rs. 30,000 bail with two sureties of equal amount, conditional on full cooperation with investigation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Mohit Agarwal @ Golu vs. State of Bihar (B.P. No. 317/2026) The Sessions Judge granted bail to Mohit Agarwal, accused in a gold snatching case, finding only suspicion against him rather than direct evidence. The court noted that while other co-accused had clear involvement, materials against the petitioner were insufficient—his name emerged solely from mobile connectivity with another person, the victim's allegations targeted different individuals, and crucial statements were missing from the case diary. The judge balanced individual liberty against prosecution interests and released him on Rs. 30,000 bail with two sureties of equal amount, conditional on full cooperation with investigation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Gaya DJ Div. All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case