RITIK KUMAR vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 685/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 87. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGA010030012026

Filing Number

2850/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

685/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

Gaya DJ Div.

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

363

Police Station

MAGADH M COLLEGE

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 87

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RITIK KUMAR

    Adv. Sri Bidhib Rajkar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court granted anticipatory bail to Ritik Kumar in a case under BNS Section 87, finding that the police unlawfully detained him despite court-ordered interim protection, and that both he and the informant's adult daughter (Sonika Kumari) were majors who had validly married. The court directed his release on a Rs. 20,000 bail bond with two sureties and registered a separate case against the SHO for violating fundamental rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Bail Matters

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Bail Matters

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Bail Matters

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 685/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to Ritik Kumar in a case under BNS Section 87, finding that the police unlawfully detained him despite court-ordered interim protection, and that both he and the informant's adult daughter (Sonika Kumari) were majors who had validly married. The court directed his release on a Rs. 20,000 bail bond with two sureties and registered a separate case against the SHO for violating fundamental rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case