TULSI PRASAD KESHARI AND OTHERS vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COLLECTOR GAYA AND OTHER — 23/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 31,32. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 19th March 2026.
Civil Miscellaneous
CNR: BRGA010028032025
Filing Number
126/2025
Filing Date
11-02-2025
Registration No
23/2025
Registration Date
11-02-2025
Court
Gaya DJ Div.
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
19th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
TULSI PRASAD KESHARI AND OTHERS
Adv. SAMRENDRA KUMAR
Respondent(s)
STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COLLECTOR GAYA AND OTHER
COMPETENT AUTHORITY CUM DISTRICT LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, GAYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Hearing On Addmission
Hearing On Addmission
Hearing On Addmission
Hearing On Addmission
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing On Addmission |
| 27-01-2026 | Hearing On Addmission |
| 03-01-2026 | Hearing On Addmission |
| 11-12-2025 | Hearing On Addmission |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal District Judge, Gayaji disposed of the miscellaneous application and directed the return of Rs. 2,25,990/- (the undisputed land acquisition arbitral award) from the Principal Civil Court to the concerned authority so that plaintiffs Tulsi Prasad Keshri and others could receive the amount. Both the plaintiff's counsel and the Government Pleader agreed there was no dispute regarding the arbitral amount, which had been delayed due to administrative procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal District Judge, Gayaji disposed of the miscellaneous application and directed the return of Rs. 2,25,990/- (the undisputed land acquisition arbitral award) from the Principal Civil Court to the concerned authority so that plaintiffs Tulsi Prasad Keshri and others could receive the amount. Both the plaintiff's counsel and the Government Pleader agreed there was no dispute regarding the arbitral amount, which had been delayed due to administrative procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts