ZEESHAN KHAN AND OTHER vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 636/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),109,3(5). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 11th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRGA010027752026
Filing Number
2634/2026
Filing Date
12-Feb-2026
Registration No
636/2026
Registration Date
12-Feb-2026
Court
Gaya DJ Div.
Judge
4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
12
Police Station
MAGADH VISWAVIDYALAY
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ZEESHAN KHAN AND OTHER
Adv. MUKESH KUMAR VERMA
-
2.AFRIDI KHAN ALIAS SHAHID AFRIDI KHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Additional Sessions Judge, Gaya rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Zeeshan Khan and Afridi Khan in connection with a firearm assault case. The court found that the prosecution had sufficient evidence including witness statements, CCTV footage showing the accused assaulting the victim with lathi, a recovered bullet, and the accused's criminal antecedent, which outweighed the defense arguments regarding procedural irregularities and compromise. The court directed the petitioners to surrender before the Trial Court within one month, allowing the Trial Court to decide on bail on merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
09-Mar-2026
Bail Matters
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
18-Feb-2026
Bail Matters
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
16-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 636/2026
The Additional Sessions Judge, Gaya rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Zeeshan Khan and Afridi Khan in connection with a firearm assault case. The court found that the prosecution had sufficient evidence including witness statements, CCTV footage showing the accused assaulting the victim with lathi, a recovered bullet, and the accused's criminal antecedent, which outweighed the defense arguments regarding procedural irregularities and compromise. The court directed the petitioners to surrender before the Trial Court within one month, allowing the Trial Court to decide on bail on merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts