GUDDU KUMAR AND OTHERS vs STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 606/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 87. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 18th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRGA010026212026
Filing Number
2486/2026
Filing Date
10-Feb-2026
Registration No
606/2026
Registration Date
10-Feb-2026
Court
Gaya DJ Div.
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
64
Police Station
FATEHPUR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GUDDU KUMAR AND OTHERS
Adv. RAVI KANT
-
2.BITTU KUMAR
-
3.PINTU KUMAR
-
4.NARESH MITSRI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court disposed of the anticipatory bail petition filed by Guddu Kumar and three others, who were accused under Section 87 of BNS in connection with a case involving an alleged irregular marriage. The court found no basis for the petition since the police had already closed the investigation, submitted a Final Form, and determined it was a mistake of fact without filing any chargesheet, thereby eliminating any apprehension of arrest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Bail Matters
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Bail Matters
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
Bail Matters
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 606/2026
The court disposed of the anticipatory bail petition filed by Guddu Kumar and three others, who were accused under Section 87 of BNS in connection with a case involving an alleged irregular marriage. The court found no basis for the petition since the police had already closed the investigation, submitted a Final Form, and determined it was a mistake of fact without filing any chargesheet, thereby eliminating any apprehension of arrest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts