ARUN RAVIDAS vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH — 574/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 87. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRGA010024802026
Filing Number
2353/2026
Filing Date
07-Feb-2026
Registration No
574/2026
Registration Date
07-Feb-2026
Court
Gaya DJ Div.
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 07-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
769
Police Station
GAYA MUFASSIL
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARUN RAVIDAS
Adv. RITU SINHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary: The Sessions Judge, Gayaji granted anticipatory bail to Arun Ravidas in a case registered under Section 87 of the BNS (relating to marriage). The court accepted the petitioner's argument that both parties are majors (the victim Sonali Kumari was born 03.02.2005) who voluntarily married and are living together, thereby finding no offense under Section 87. The petitioner was directed to furnish bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Feb-2026
Bail Matters
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
Bail Matters
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
Bail Matters
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 574/2026
Summary: The Sessions Judge, Gayaji granted anticipatory bail to Arun Ravidas in a case registered under Section 87 of the BNS (relating to marriage). The court accepted the petitioner's argument that both parties are majors (the victim Sonali Kumari was born 03.02.2005) who voluntarily married and are living together, thereby finding no offense under Section 87. The petitioner was directed to furnish bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts