SAYNA NAZ AND OTHER vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 547/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),191(2),190,76,303(2). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 30th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRGA010023672026
Filing Number
2252/2026
Filing Date
06-Feb-2026
Registration No
547/2026
Registration Date
06-Feb-2026
Court
Gaya DJ Div.
Judge
4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 28-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
305
Police Station
Vishnupad
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SAYNA NAZ AND OTHER
Adv. MD. ABUZAR GHAFFARI
-
2.NAAZ KHATOON
-
3.MD. SAQIB
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Additional District & Sessions Judge-I, Gaya dismissed the anticipatory bail petition (A.B.P. No. 547/2026) filed by Sayna Naz and others on the ground of non-prosecution. The court found that petitioners' counsel failed to appear on two consecutive dates, demonstrating lack of interest in prosecuting the bail application. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail petition was dismissed for default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
12-Mar-2026
Bail Matters
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
20-Feb-2026
Bail Matters
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
18-Feb-2026
Bail Matters
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
Bail Matters
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 547/2026
The Additional District & Sessions Judge-I, Gaya dismissed the anticipatory bail petition (A.B.P. No. 547/2026) filed by Sayna Naz and others on the ground of non-prosecution. The court found that petitioners' counsel failed to appear on two consecutive dates, demonstrating lack of interest in prosecuting the bail application. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail petition was dismissed for default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts