BITHAL BIND vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 217/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(1),96. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 12th March 2026.

Regular Bail

CNR: BRGA010021972026

Case disposed

Filing Number

2099/2026

Filing Date

03-02-2026

Registration No

217/2026

Registration Date

03-02-2026

Court

Gaya DJ Div.

Judge

4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

FIR Details

FIR Number

453

Police Station

TEKARI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(1),96

Petitioner(s)

BITHAL BIND

Adv. ARUN KUMAR

Respondent(s)

STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA

Hearing History

Judge: 4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

12-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

BAIL MATTERS

27-02-2026

BAIL MATTERS

23-02-2026

BAIL MATTERS

19-02-2026

BAIL MATTERS

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Order

The Additional Sessions Judge-I, Gaya rejected Bithal Bind's bail petition on 12.03.2026. Bind was accused of kidnapping a 14-year-old minor girl on 23.10.2025 under BNS sections 137(1) and 96; the victim's statement revealed he took her to Kurtha Temple where they married and subsequently lived together at Patratu Brick Kiln, with the victim now pregnant. The court found the allegations grave and serious, with a charge-sheet already filed, and therefore declined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge-I, Gaya rejected Bithal Bind's bail petition on 12.03.2026. Bind was accused of kidnapping a 14-year-old minor girl on 23.10.2025 under BNS sections 137(1) and 96; the victim's statement revealed he took her to Kurtha Temple where they married and subsequently lived together at Patratu Brick Kiln, with the victim now pregnant. The court found the allegations grave and serious, with a charge-sheet already filed, and therefore declined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Gaya DJ Div. All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case