RESHMI DEVI vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH — 62/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 408. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Mislaneous

CNR: BRGA010019782026

Filing Number

1889/2026

Filing Date

31-Jan-2026

Registration No

62/2026

Registration Date

31-Jan-2026

Court

Gaya DJ Div.

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 18-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

124

Police Station

Chakand

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 408

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RESHMI DEVI

    Adv. SHYAM SUNDAR DAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Sessions Judge, Gaya dismissed Reshmi Devi's petition seeking consolidation of five session cases (arising from Chakand P.S. Case No. 124/2020) into one court. The court found the petition not maintainable after a clerk's report confirmed that four cases were already pending in the same court (Additional Sessions Judge-3, Gaya), while one case (Str. No. 14/2021) was unrelated to the original case and thus could not be consolidated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 03-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 31-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 62/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Judge, Gaya dismissed Reshmi Devi's petition seeking consolidation of five session cases (arising from Chakand P.S. Case No. 124/2020) into one court. The court found the petition not maintainable after a clerk's report confirmed that four cases were already pending in the same court (Additional Sessions Judge-3, Gaya), while one case (Str. No. 14/2021) was unrelated to the original case and thus could not be consolidated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case