RAVINDRA MISTRY AND OTHER vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 393/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,325,307,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 16th March 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGA010016942026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1627/2026

Filing Date

28-01-2026

Registration No

393/2026

Registration Date

28-01-2026

Court

Gaya DJ Div.

Judge

5-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

FIR Details

FIR Number

49

Police Station

Alipur

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,325,307,504,506,34

Petitioner(s)

RAVINDRA MISTRY AND OTHER

Adv. BIPIN KUMAR

RAJ KUMAR

Respondent(s)

STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA

Hearing History

Judge: 5-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

16-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

BAIL MATTERS

18-02-2026

BAIL MATTERS

02-02-2026

BAIL MATTERS

30-01-2026

BAIL MATTERS

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Order

The Additional Sessions Judge-II, Gaya rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Ravindra Mistry and Raj Kumar in a case involving alleged assault with iron rods causing head injury and fractured hand to multiple victims. The court found that specific and direct allegations supported by medical injury reports corroborated the prosecution's case of assault with hard weapons on vital body parts, making the grant of anticipatory bail inappropriate at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge-II, Gaya rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Ravindra Mistry and Raj Kumar in a case involving alleged assault with iron rods causing head injury and fractured hand to multiple victims. The court found that specific and direct allegations supported by medical injury reports corroborated the prosecution's case of assault with hard weapons on vital body parts, making the grant of anticipatory bail inappropriate at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Gaya DJ Div. All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case