RAVINDRA MISTRY AND OTHER vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 393/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,325,307,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 16th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRGA010016942026
Filing Number
1627/2026
Filing Date
28-Jan-2026
Registration No
393/2026
Registration Date
28-Jan-2026
Court
Gaya DJ Div.
Judge
5-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
49
Police Station
Alipur
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAVINDRA MISTRY AND OTHER
Adv. BIPIN KUMAR
-
2.RAJ KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Additional Sessions Judge-II, Gaya rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Ravindra Mistry and Raj Kumar in a case involving alleged assault with iron rods causing head injury and fractured hand to multiple victims. The court found that specific and direct allegations supported by medical injury reports corroborated the prosecution's case of assault with hard weapons on vital body parts, making the grant of anticipatory bail inappropriate at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
09-Mar-2026
Bail Matters
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
18-Feb-2026
Bail Matters
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
02-Feb-2026
Bail Matters
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
30-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 393/2026
The Additional Sessions Judge-II, Gaya rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Ravindra Mistry and Raj Kumar in a case involving alleged assault with iron rods causing head injury and fractured hand to multiple victims. The court found that specific and direct allegations supported by medical injury reports corroborated the prosecution's case of assault with hard weapons on vital body parts, making the grant of anticipatory bail inappropriate at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts