AVINASH KUMAR vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 338/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGA010015112026

Filing Number

1450/2026

Filing Date

24-Jan-2026

Registration No

338/2026

Registration Date

24-Jan-2026

Court

Gaya DJ Div.

Judge

5-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 18-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

587

Police Station

COMPLAINT CASE

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 420

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AVINASH KUMAR

    Adv. VISHAL KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge-II, Gaya granted anticipatory bail to Avinash Kumar in a case involving a bounced cheque (Section 420 IPC) related to a vehicle sale transaction. The court found the dispute to be primarily civil in nature, noting that the accused claimed the disputed amount was already paid through another party and that no prima facie criminal case was made out against him. The accused was granted bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Bail Matters

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Bail Matters

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    Bail Matters

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

  7. 28-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 24-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 338/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge-II, Gaya granted anticipatory bail to Avinash Kumar in a case involving a bounced cheque (Section 420 IPC) related to a vehicle sale transaction. The court found the dispute to be primarily civil in nature, noting that the accused claimed the disputed amount was already paid through another party and that no prima facie criminal case was made out against him. The accused was granted bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case