VISHNU YADAV ALIAS VISHUNDEO YADAV AND OTHER vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 330/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 190,191(2),191(3),126(2),115(2),117(2),109,132. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 30th March 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGA010014912026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1430/2026

Filing Date

24-01-2026

Registration No

330/2026

Registration Date

24-01-2026

Court

Gaya DJ Div.

Judge

4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

FIR Details

FIR Number

565

Police Station

FATEHPUR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 190,191(2),191(3),126(2),115(2),117(2),109,132

Petitioner(s)

VISHNU YADAV ALIAS VISHUNDEO YADAV AND OTHER

Adv. SAVITA KUMARI

VEENAY YADAV ALIAS BRAJESH KUMAR

SANJAY YADAV ALIAS HARI YADAV

Respondent(s)

STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA

Hearing History

Judge: 4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

30-03-2026

Disposed

19-03-2026

BAIL MATTERS

11-03-2026

BAIL MATTERS

21-02-2026

BAIL MATTERS

11-02-2026

BAIL MATTERS

Final Orders / Judgements

30-03-2026
Order

The Additional Sessions Judge-I, Gaya rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Vishun Yadav and two co-accused. The petitioners were accused of attacking police personnel with bricks and stones during a raid, causing injuries. The court denied bail considering the nature of the offense, its effect on society, the ongoing investigation stage, and the fact that this was an anticipatory bail application (distinguishing it from regular bail already granted to co-accused). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge-I, Gaya rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Vishun Yadav and two co-accused. The petitioners were accused of attacking police personnel with bricks and stones during a raid, causing injuries. The court denied bail considering the nature of the offense, its effect on society, the ongoing investigation stage, and the fact that this was an anticipatory bail application (distinguishing it from regular bail already granted to co-accused). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Gaya DJ Div. All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case