CHAMARUDDIN ANSARI ALIAS KAMRUDIN MIYAN vs STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHER Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 14/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 28th April 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Revision

CNR: BRGA010014532026

Filing Number

1393/2026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

14/2026

Registration Date

22-Jan-2026

Court

Gaya DJ Div.

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

28-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 18-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHAMARUDDIN ANSARI ALIAS KAMRUDIN MIYAN

    Adv. GOPAL KUMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHER Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA

  2. 2.SUDHIR KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge, Gaya dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Chamaruddin Ansari challenging an ACJM order issuing process under Section 82 Cr.P.C. in a criminal case dating back to 2009. The court rejected the petitioner's request for condonation of delay in filing the revision, finding that the delay exceeded the permissible grace period of 90 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    addmission

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    addmission

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    addmission

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    addmission

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  8. 09-Feb-2026

    addmission

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  9. 27-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 22-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 14/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge, Gaya dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Chamaruddin Ansari challenging an ACJM order issuing process under Section 82 Cr.P.C. in a criminal case dating back to 2009. The court rejected the petitioner's request for condonation of delay in filing the revision, finding that the delay exceeded the permissible grace period of 90 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case