SUNDAR KUMAR vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH — 210/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2),111,132,352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 17th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRGA010009432026
Filing Number
907/2026
Filing Date
16-Jan-2026
Registration No
210/2026
Registration Date
16-Jan-2026
Court
Gaya DJ Div.
Judge
5-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
264
Police Station
BUNIYAD GANJ
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUNDAR KUMAR
Adv. SUBODH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary The Additional Sessions Judge-II, Gaya rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Sundar Kumar, who is accused of attempting to snatch a sand-laden tractor from police custody during an illegal mining operation. The court found direct allegations against the petitioner in the FIR and deemed the offense (snatching from police premises) sufficiently serious to deny bail at this stage, despite the petitioner's claims of innocence and no criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
09-Mar-2026
Bail Matters
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
27-Feb-2026
Bail Matters
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
23-Feb-2026
Bail Matters
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
11-Feb-2026
Bail Matters
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
30-Jan-2026
Bail Matters
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
21-Jan-2026
Bail Matters
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
19-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 210/2026
Case Summary The Additional Sessions Judge-II, Gaya rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Sundar Kumar, who is accused of attempting to snatch a sand-laden tractor from police custody during an illegal mining operation. The court found direct allegations against the petitioner in the FIR and deemed the offense (snatching from police premises) sufficiently serious to deny bail at this stage, despite the petitioner's claims of innocence and no criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts