STATE OF BIHAR vs ANUGRAH MAHTO @ UGRAH MAHTO — 10012/2008

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances(execution of Bond by Convicts or Addicts) Rules,1985 Section 8B,15,18. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 02-May-2026 this date has passed

NDPS. S. CASE

CNR: BRGA010003062008

Filing Number

10012/2008

Filing Date

10-May-2008

Registration No

10012/2008

Registration Date

10-May-2008

Court

Gaya DJ Div.

Judge

4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances(execution of Bond by Convicts or Addicts) Rules,1985 Section 8B,15,18

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

    Adv. SADULLHA FAROOQUE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANUGRAH MAHTO @ UGRAH MAHTO

Case History

  1. 02-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  3. 21-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  4. 05-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  5. 15-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  6. 25-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  7. 21-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  8. 05-May-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  9. 11-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  10. 03-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  11. 01-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  12. 04-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  13. 05-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  14. 23-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  15. 11-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  16. 19-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  17. 16-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  18. 20-May-2024

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  19. 21-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  20. 24-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  21. 23-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  22. 14-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  23. 11-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  24. 12-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  25. 07-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  26. 04-May-2023

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  27. 06-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  28. 10-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  29. 08-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  30. 19-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  31. 17-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  32. 16-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  33. 15-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  34. 12-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  35. 16-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  36. 21-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  37. 24-Jun-2022

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  38. 22-Jun-2022

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  39. 10-Jun-2022

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  40. 08-Jun-2022

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  41. 04-Jun-2022

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  42. 17-May-2022

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  43. 21-Apr-2022

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  44. 04-Apr-2022

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  45. 03-Mar-2022

    Appearence

  46. 02-Feb-2022

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  47. 10-Jan-2022

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  48. 15-Dec-2021

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  49. 16-Nov-2021

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  50. 04-Oct-2021

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  51. 20-Sep-2021

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  52. 02-Sep-2021

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  53. 11-Aug-2021

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  54. 23-Jul-2021

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  55. 02-Jul-2021

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  56. 08-Jun-2021

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  57. 11-May-2021

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  58. 09-Apr-2021

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  59. 08-Apr-2021

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  60. 05-Apr-2021

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: Bail petition of Sudama Mahton filed on 01.04.2021 under NDPS Act sections 8(b), 15, and 18 has been rejected. The court found credible evidence that the petitioner was involved in opium cultivation, with 3870 opium plants recovered from his field where liquid extraction was underway. Considering the nature of allegations, the Additional Sessions Judge, Gaya declined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  61. 25-Mar-2021

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  62. 13-Mar-2021

    Restored

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  63. 13-Mar-2021

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  64. 15-Jan-2021

    OrderView PDF

  65. 15-Jan-2021

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  66. 19-Oct-2020

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  67. 04-Sep-2020

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  68. 04-Jul-2020

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  69. 11-May-2020

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  70. 13-Mar-2020

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  71. 20-Jan-2020

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  72. 05-Dec-2019

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  73. 24-Sep-2019

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  74. 08-Jul-2019

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  75. 24-Apr-2019

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  76. 30-Jan-2019

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  77. 28-Jan-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  78. 10-May-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. 10012/2008

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Bail petition of Sudama Mahton filed on 01.04.2021 under NDPS Act sections 8(b), 15, and 18 has been rejected. The court found credible evidence that the petitioner was involved in opium cultivation, with 3870 opium plants recovered from his field where liquid extraction was underway. Considering the nature of allegations, the Additional Sessions Judge, Gaya declined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case