STATE OF BIHAR vs ANUGRAH MAHTO @ UGRAH MAHTO — 10012/2008
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances(execution of Bond by Convicts or Addicts) Rules,1985 Section 8B,15,18. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.
NDPS. S. CASE
CNR: BRGA010003062008
Next Hearing
02nd May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
10012/2008
Filing Date
10-05-2008
Registration No
10012/2008
Registration Date
10-05-2008
Court
Gaya DJ Div.
Judge
4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF BIHAR
Adv. SADULLHA FAROOQUE
Respondent(s)
ANUGRAH MAHTO @ UGRAH MAHTO
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 21-01-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 05-12-2025 | EVIDENCE | |
| 15-10-2025 | EVIDENCE | |
| 25-08-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: Bail petition of Sudama Mahton filed on 01.04.2021 under NDPS Act sections 8(b), 15, and 18 has been rejected. The court found credible evidence that the petitioner was involved in opium cultivation, with 3870 opium plants recovered from his field where liquid extraction was underway. Considering the nature of allegations, the Additional Sessions Judge, Gaya declined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Bail petition of Sudama Mahton filed on 01.04.2021 under NDPS Act sections 8(b), 15, and 18 has been rejected. The court found credible evidence that the petitioner was involved in opium cultivation, with 3870 opium plants recovered from his field where liquid extraction was underway. Considering the nature of allegations, the Additional Sessions Judge, Gaya declined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts