BAIJNATH CHAUDAHRY vs STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHER — 3/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Revision

CNR: BRGA010002662026

Filing Number

257/2026

Filing Date

06-Jan-2026

Registration No

3/2026

Registration Date

06-Jan-2026

Court

Gaya DJ Div.

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

719

Police Station

COMPLAINT CASE

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BAIJNATH CHAUDAHRY

    Adv. PRMOD KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHER

  2. 2.SUKHENDRA KUMAR

  3. 3.JITENDRA KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Order

    The Sessions Judge dismissed the criminal revision application filed by Baijnath Chaudhary against the lower court's dismissal of his complaint under Section 226 BNSS. The court upheld the Judicial Magistrate's finding that the complaint was an attempt to convert a civil dispute regarding non-refund of money into a criminal offense, lacking sufficient prima facie evidence to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    addmission

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    addmission

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 28-Jan-2026

    addmission

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 13-Jan-2026

    addmission

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  8. 08-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 06-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge dismissed the criminal revision application filed by Baijnath Chaudhary against the lower court's dismissal of his complaint under Section 226 BNSS. The court upheld the Judicial Magistrate's finding that the complaint was an attempt to convert a civil dispute regarding non-refund of money into a criminal offense, lacking sufficient prima facie evidence to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case