JAY KISHOR PRASAD vs SHAMBHUNATH GUPTA — 59/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Appearence. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.

Appearence Next hearing 20-Jul-2026

Partion Suit - TITLE PARTITION SUIT

CNR: BREC320002262025

Filing Number

226/2025

Filing Date

23-Aug-2025

Registration No

59/2025

Registration Date

23-Aug-2025

Court

Areraj Civil Division

Judge

3-Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAY KISHOR PRASAD

    Adv. KAUSHAL KISHORE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHAMBHUNATH GUPTA

  2. 2.VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA

  3. 3.VINOD KUMAR GUPTA

  4. 4.LILAWATI DEVI

Case History

  1. 20-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Appearence

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  3. 25-May-2026

    Appearence

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  6. 06-Jan-2026

    OrderView PDF

    In Case 59/2025 (Prasad v. Gupta et al.), the court on 06-01-2026 ordered the respondents to file their reply/response within 22 days under Rule 4 and Rule 151 of the applicable procedure. The court found the petitioner's claim regarding defects in the respondents' pleadings partly valid and directed proper procedure be followed. The case was adjourned pending receipt of respondents' reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 06-Jan-2026

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  8. 14-Oct-2025

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  9. 12-Sep-2025

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  10. 08-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 23-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 59/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In Case 59/2025 (Prasad v. Gupta et al.), the court on 06-01-2026 ordered the respondents to file their reply/response within 22 days under Rule 4 and Rule 151 of the applicable procedure. The court found the petitioner's claim regarding defects in the respondents' pleadings partly valid and directed proper procedure be followed. The case was adjourned pending receipt of respondents' reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case