VINOD KUMAR SINGH vs RINTU THAKUR — 142/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BREC320002072022
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
207/2022
Filing Date
14-11-2022
Registration No
142/2022
Registration Date
14-11-2022
Court
Areraj Civil Division
Judge
1-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VINOD KUMAR SINGH
Adv. ANIL TIWARI
Respondent(s)
RINTU THAKUR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 30-01-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 19-01-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 26-11-2025 | EVIDENCE | |
| 13-10-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: This is a civil suit (Case No. 142/2022) before the Sub Judge, East Champaran district, dated 18-12-2023. The court found no settlement possibility between the parties and framed six issues for adjudication, including whether the suit is maintainable, whether the plaintiff has title and cause of action, whether the Mahadanama deed executed by defendant Rintu Thakur is genuine or fraudulent, and what reliefs the plaintiff is entitled to. The case has been posted for further proceedings to determine these disputed questions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: This is a civil suit (Case No. 142/2022) before the Sub Judge, East Champaran district, dated 18-12-2023. The court found no settlement possibility between the parties and framed six issues for adjudication, including whether the suit is maintainable, whether the plaintiff has title and cause of action, whether the Mahadanama deed executed by defendant Rintu Thakur is genuine or fraudulent, and what reliefs the plaintiff is entitled to. The case has been posted for further proceedings to determine these disputed questions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts