VASHISHT SINGH AND OTHERS vs MRITYUNJAY KUMAR MISHRA AND OTHERS — 93/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BREC320001612021
Filing Number
161/2021
Filing Date
22-Oct-2021
Registration No
93/2021
Registration Date
22-Oct-2021
Court
Areraj Civil Division
Judge
1-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
Last updated 23-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VASHISHT SINGH AND OTHERS
Adv. DEVENDRA PRASAD SINGH
-
2.LALITA DEVI
-
3.ANIKET KUMAR
-
4.SACHIN KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.MRITYUNJAY KUMAR MISHRA AND OTHERS
-
2.ALOK KUMAR
-
3.MUSMAT KANTI DEVI
-
4.MUSMAT LALPARI DEVI
-
5.MUSMAT LAVNITA SINGH
-
6.SAPANA KUMARI
-
7.VIRAT KUMAR(NABALIK)
Case History
-
20-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
02-May-2026
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
08-Jan-2026
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
30-Oct-2025
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
11-Sep-2025
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
07-Aug-2025
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
21-Jun-2025
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
01-May-2025
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
12-Mar-2025
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
11-Dec-2024
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
29-Oct-2024
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
02-Sep-2024
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
22-Jul-2024
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
10-Jun-2024
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
06-May-2024
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
03-Apr-2024
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
27-Feb-2024
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
26-Feb-2024
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
25-Jan-2024
OrderView PDF
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for a temporary injunction (dated 25.01.2024) in this land dispute case (CIS No. 93/21). The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as the disputed land is currently in the defendants' possession through a deed dated 25.09.2021, and the balance of convenience does not favor granting the injunction. The case has been adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Jan-2024
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
02-Jan-2024
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
21-Nov-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
11-Oct-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
05-Sep-2023
Appearence
-
05-Aug-2023
Appearence
-
22-Jun-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
01-May-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
06-Apr-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
01-Mar-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
25-Jan-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
20-Dec-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
15-Nov-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
11-Oct-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
29-Sep-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
01-Sep-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
05-Aug-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
12-Jul-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
24-Jun-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
03-Jun-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
26-May-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
06-May-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
22-Apr-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
12-Apr-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
25-Mar-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
11-Mar-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
02-Mar-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
22-Feb-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
14-Feb-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
04-Feb-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
15-Dec-2021
Appearence
-
30-Nov-2021
Appearence
-
25-Oct-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Oct-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 93/2021
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for a temporary injunction (dated 25.01.2024) in this land dispute case (CIS No. 93/21). The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as the disputed land is currently in the defendants' possession through a deed dated 25.09.2021, and the balance of convenience does not favor granting the injunction. The case has been adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts