KAMIL RAJA KHAN vs KABULI SAH AND OTHERS — 96/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Appearence. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BREC320001592019
Filing Number
156/2019
Filing Date
22-Aug-2019
Registration No
96/2019
Registration Date
22-Aug-2019
Court
Areraj Civil Division
Judge
1-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
Last updated 23-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KAMIL RAJA KHAN
Adv. BAMSHANKAR SRIVASTAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.KABULI SAH AND OTHERS
-
2.AMERIKA SAH
-
3.CHANDRIKA SAH
-
4.PRABHU SAH
-
5.BHUTELI SAH
Case History
-
02-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
21-May-2026
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
16-Apr-2026
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
12-Mar-2026
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
29-Jan-2026
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
10-Dec-2025
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
06-Nov-2025
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
11-Sep-2025
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
24-Jul-2025
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
29-May-2025
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
17-Apr-2025
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
06-Feb-2025
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
02-Jan-2025
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
21-Nov-2024
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
24-Oct-2024
Hearing
Sub Judge
-
05-Sep-2024
Hearing
Sub Judge
-
01-Aug-2024
Hearing
Sub Judge
-
04-Jul-2024
Hearing
Sub Judge
-
30-May-2024
Hearing
Sub Judge
-
18-Apr-2024
Hearing
Sub Judge
-
23-Mar-2024
Hearing
Sub Judge
-
29-Feb-2024
OrderView PDF
Case Summary Case No.: Svt. Vad Sankhya 96/19 Court: Subordinate Judge (CIS), Areraj, East Champaran Date: 29.02.2024 Outcome: The temporary injunction petition under CPC Order 39 Rules 1, 2 and Section 151 has been DISMISSED. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish all three essential requirements for granting temporary injunction: (1) no prima facie case, as the plaintiff lacks current possession of the disputed land while the defendant resides in a residential structure on it; (2) balance of convenience does not favor the plaintiff; and (3) no irreparable injury to the plaintiff. The case is directed for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Feb-2024
Hearing
Sub Judge
-
08-Feb-2024
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
18-Jan-2024
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
04-Jan-2024
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
21-Dec-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
23-Nov-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
12-Oct-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
21-Sep-2023
Appearence
-
03-Aug-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
20-Apr-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
23-Mar-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
16-Feb-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
05-Jan-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
03-Dec-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
19-Nov-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
13-Oct-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
15-Sep-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
01-Sep-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
11-Aug-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
07-Jul-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
23-Jun-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
26-May-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
16-Apr-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
10-Mar-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
17-Feb-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
06-Dec-2021
Appearence
-
09-Sep-2021
Appearence
-
03-Sep-2021
Appearence
-
15-Jun-2021
Appearence
-
29-Apr-2021
Appearence
-
01-Apr-2021
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
25-Feb-2021
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
04-Feb-2021
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
07-Jan-2021
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
12-Nov-2020
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
27-Aug-2020
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
16-Jul-2020
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
30-Apr-2020
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
21-Mar-2020
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
20-Feb-2020
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
06-Feb-2020
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
04-Jan-2020
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
02-Jan-2020
addmission
Sub Judge
-
21-Dec-2019
addmission
Sub Judge
-
28-Nov-2019
addmission
Sub Judge
-
23-Nov-2019
addmission
Sub Judge
-
24-Oct-2019
addmission
Sub Judge
-
19-Sep-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Aug-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 96/2019
Case Summary Case No.: Svt. Vad Sankhya 96/19 Court: Subordinate Judge (CIS), Areraj, East Champaran Date: 29.02.2024 Outcome: The temporary injunction petition under CPC Order 39 Rules 1, 2 and Section 151 has been DISMISSED. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish all three essential requirements for granting temporary injunction: (1) no prima facie case, as the plaintiff lacks current possession of the disputed land while the defendant resides in a residential structure on it; (2) balance of convenience does not favor the plaintiff; and (3) no irreparable injury to the plaintiff. The case is directed for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts