KAMIL RAJA KHAN vs KABULI SAH AND OTHERS — 96/2019

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Appearence. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.

Appearence Next hearing 02-Jul-2026 this date has passed

Title Suit

CNR: BREC320001592019

Filing Number

156/2019

Filing Date

22-Aug-2019

Registration No

96/2019

Registration Date

22-Aug-2019

Court

Areraj Civil Division

Judge

1-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAMIL RAJA KHAN

    Adv. BAMSHANKAR SRIVASTAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KABULI SAH AND OTHERS

  2. 2.AMERIKA SAH

  3. 3.CHANDRIKA SAH

  4. 4.PRABHU SAH

  5. 5.BHUTELI SAH

Case History

  1. 02-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 21-May-2026

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  5. 29-Jan-2026

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  6. 10-Dec-2025

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  7. 06-Nov-2025

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  8. 11-Sep-2025

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  9. 24-Jul-2025

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  10. 29-May-2025

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  11. 17-Apr-2025

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  12. 06-Feb-2025

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  13. 02-Jan-2025

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  14. 21-Nov-2024

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  15. 24-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    Sub Judge

  16. 05-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    Sub Judge

  17. 01-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    Sub Judge

  18. 04-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    Sub Judge

  19. 30-May-2024

    Hearing

    Sub Judge

  20. 18-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    Sub Judge

  21. 23-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    Sub Judge

  22. 29-Feb-2024

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary Case No.: Svt. Vad Sankhya 96/19 Court: Subordinate Judge (CIS), Areraj, East Champaran Date: 29.02.2024 Outcome: The temporary injunction petition under CPC Order 39 Rules 1, 2 and Section 151 has been DISMISSED. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish all three essential requirements for granting temporary injunction: (1) no prima facie case, as the plaintiff lacks current possession of the disputed land while the defendant resides in a residential structure on it; (2) balance of convenience does not favor the plaintiff; and (3) no irreparable injury to the plaintiff. The case is directed for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  23. 29-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    Sub Judge

  24. 08-Feb-2024

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  25. 18-Jan-2024

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  26. 04-Jan-2024

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  27. 21-Dec-2023

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  28. 23-Nov-2023

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  29. 12-Oct-2023

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  30. 21-Sep-2023

    Appearence

  31. 03-Aug-2023

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  32. 20-Apr-2023

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  33. 23-Mar-2023

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  34. 16-Feb-2023

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  35. 05-Jan-2023

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  36. 03-Dec-2022

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  37. 19-Nov-2022

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  38. 13-Oct-2022

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  39. 15-Sep-2022

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  40. 01-Sep-2022

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  41. 11-Aug-2022

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  42. 07-Jul-2022

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  43. 23-Jun-2022

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  44. 26-May-2022

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  45. 16-Apr-2022

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  46. 10-Mar-2022

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  47. 17-Feb-2022

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  48. 06-Dec-2021

    Appearence

  49. 09-Sep-2021

    Appearence

  50. 03-Sep-2021

    Appearence

  51. 15-Jun-2021

    Appearence

  52. 29-Apr-2021

    Appearence

  53. 01-Apr-2021

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  54. 25-Feb-2021

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  55. 04-Feb-2021

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  56. 07-Jan-2021

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  57. 12-Nov-2020

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  58. 27-Aug-2020

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  59. 16-Jul-2020

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  60. 30-Apr-2020

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  61. 21-Mar-2020

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  62. 20-Feb-2020

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  63. 06-Feb-2020

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  64. 04-Jan-2020

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  65. 02-Jan-2020

    addmission

    Sub Judge

  66. 21-Dec-2019

    addmission

    Sub Judge

  67. 28-Nov-2019

    addmission

    Sub Judge

  68. 23-Nov-2019

    addmission

    Sub Judge

  69. 24-Oct-2019

    addmission

    Sub Judge

  70. 19-Sep-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  71. 22-Aug-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 96/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No.: Svt. Vad Sankhya 96/19 Court: Subordinate Judge (CIS), Areraj, East Champaran Date: 29.02.2024 Outcome: The temporary injunction petition under CPC Order 39 Rules 1, 2 and Section 151 has been DISMISSED. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish all three essential requirements for granting temporary injunction: (1) no prima facie case, as the plaintiff lacks current possession of the disputed land while the defendant resides in a residential structure on it; (2) balance of convenience does not favor the plaintiff; and (3) no irreparable injury to the plaintiff. The case is directed for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case