SUKAT MAHTO AND OTR. vs VISHWANATH MAHTO AND OTR. — 827/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
Partion Suit - TITLE PARTITION SUIT
CNR: BREC320000812013
Filing Number
570/2013
Filing Date
18-Jun-2013
Registration No
827/2018
Registration Date
18-Jun-2013
Court
Areraj Civil Division
Judge
1-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
Last updated 24-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUKAT MAHTO AND OTR.
Adv. NA
Respondent(s)
-
1.VISHWANATH MAHTO AND OTR.
Case History
-
17-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
16-Jan-2026
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
28-Nov-2025
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
15-Oct-2025
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
17-Sep-2025
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
19-Aug-2025
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
16-Jul-2025
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
09-Jun-2025
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
05-May-2025
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
18-Feb-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
17-Dec-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
22-Oct-2024
Issues
Sub Judge
-
28-Aug-2024
Issues
Sub Judge
-
16-Jul-2024
Issues
Sub Judge
-
04-Jun-2024
Issues
Sub Judge
-
08-May-2024
Issues
Sub Judge
-
27-Mar-2024
Issues
Sub Judge
-
24-Feb-2024
Issues
Sub Judge
-
30-Jan-2024
Issues
Sub Judge
-
22-Dec-2023
Issues
Sub Judge
-
29-Nov-2023
OrderView PDF
Summary: The court allowed the application filed by defendants 11 and 12 dated 29.07.2022, ordering that the documents presented (statement documents, register copies, and orders from 2013-2016 in the name of Smt. Prakashwati Devi) be recorded as exhibits with proper exhibit numbers. The court rejected the plaintiff's objection that the defendants' application was not a public document, finding the submitted documents to be both public and relevant documents admissible as evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Nov-2023
Issues
Sub Judge
-
30-Oct-2023
Issues
Sub Judge
-
11-Sep-2023
Issues
-
10-Sep-2023
Issues
-
05-Aug-2023
Issues
-
02-Jun-2023
Issues
Sub Judge
-
01-May-2023
Issues
Sub Judge
-
15-Mar-2023
Issues
Sub Judge
-
17-Jan-2023
Issues
Sub Judge
-
14-Dec-2022
Issues
Sub Judge
-
18-Nov-2022
Issues
Sub Judge
-
14-Oct-2022
Issues
Sub Judge
-
16-Sep-2022
Issues
Sub Judge
-
26-Aug-2022
Issues
Sub Judge
-
29-Jul-2022
Issues
Sub Judge
-
08-Jun-2022
Issues
Sub Judge
-
27-Apr-2022
Issues
Sub Judge
-
04-Apr-2022
Issues
Sub Judge
-
02-Feb-2022
Issues
Sub Judge
-
22-Nov-2021
Issues
-
12-Aug-2021
Issues
-
03-Jun-2021
Issues
-
15-Apr-2021
Issues
Sub Judge
-
08-Mar-2021
Issues
Sub Judge
-
19-Dec-2020
Issues
Sub Judge
-
03-Oct-2020
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
31-Jul-2020
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
22-May-2020
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
27-Mar-2020
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
28-Feb-2020
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
07-Feb-2020
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
20-Dec-2019
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
18-Sep-2019
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
23-Aug-2019
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
14-Jun-2019
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
31-May-2019
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
18-Apr-2019
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
08-Mar-2019
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
21-Dec-2018
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
14-Dec-2018
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
07-Dec-2018
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
17-Nov-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Jun-2013
Case filed
Registration No. 827/2018
Summary: The court allowed the application filed by defendants 11 and 12 dated 29.07.2022, ordering that the documents presented (statement documents, register copies, and orders from 2013-2016 in the name of Smt. Prakashwati Devi) be recorded as exhibits with proper exhibit numbers. The court rejected the plaintiff's objection that the defendants' application was not a public document, finding the submitted documents to be both public and relevant documents admissible as evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts