SAVITRI DEVI AND OTHERS vs PARAMHANSH PANDEY AND OTHERS — 650/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BREC320000752015
Filing Number
43/2015
Filing Date
01-Oct-2015
Registration No
650/2018
Registration Date
01-Oct-2015
Court
Areraj Civil Division
Judge
1-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
Last updated 24-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SAVITRI DEVI AND OTHERS
Adv. NA
Respondent(s)
-
1.PARAMHANSH PANDEY AND OTHERS
Case History
-
10-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
16-Jan-2026
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
27-Nov-2025
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
10-Oct-2025
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
08-Sep-2025
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
07-Sep-2025
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
23-Jul-2025
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
11-Jul-2025
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
06-Jun-2025
Hearing
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
02-May-2025
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
04-Apr-2025
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
10-Mar-2025
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
25-Feb-2025
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
13-Jan-2025
OrderView PDF
Summary The petition is dismissed. The court found that the petitioner's application under Rules 4 and 10 to recall a previous order dated 14.11.2024 lacks merit. The court rejected the petitioner's arguments regarding the naming and identification of accused persons, holding that the designation of the accused as "unknown No. 34" is legally permissible and the petition should fail accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Jan-2025
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
12-Dec-2024
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
14-Nov-2024
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
26-Sep-2024
Hearing
Sub Judge
-
09-Aug-2024
Hearing
Sub Judge
-
28-Jun-2024
Hearing
Sub Judge
-
04-May-2024
Hearing
Sub Judge
-
19-Apr-2024
OrderView PDF
-
19-Apr-2024
Hearing
Sub Judge
-
14-Mar-2024
Hearing
Sub Judge
-
20-Feb-2024
Hearing
Sub Judge
-
10-Jan-2024
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
06-Dec-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
31-Oct-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
30-Oct-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
29-Sep-2023
Appearence
-
28-Sep-2023
Appearence
-
04-Sep-2023
Appearence
-
09-Aug-2023
Appearence
-
04-Jul-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
23-May-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
19-Apr-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
28-Mar-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
21-Feb-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
29-Nov-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
09-Nov-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
14-Jul-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
09-Jun-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
12-May-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
27-Apr-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
21-Apr-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
21-Mar-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
19-Mar-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
09-Dec-2021
Appearence
-
05-Oct-2021
Appearence
-
13-Jul-2021
Appearence
-
04-May-2021
Appearence
-
05-Apr-2021
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
13-Jan-2021
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
26-Nov-2020
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
01-Oct-2020
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
06-Aug-2020
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
25-Jun-2020
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
23-Apr-2020
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
26-Mar-2020
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
13-Mar-2020
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
06-Mar-2020
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
02-Mar-2020
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
29-Feb-2020
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
20-Feb-2020
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
04-Feb-2020
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
14-Jan-2020
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
06-Jan-2020
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
06-Dec-2019
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
29-Nov-2019
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
14-Oct-2019
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
11-Oct-2019
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
22-Aug-2019
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
07-Jun-2019
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
06-Jun-2019
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
26-Apr-2019
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
28-Mar-2019
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
11-Mar-2019
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
28-Feb-2019
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
21-Feb-2019
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
17-Jan-2019
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
06-Dec-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Oct-2015
Case filed
Registration No. 650/2018
Summary The petition is dismissed. The court found that the petitioner's application under Rules 4 and 10 to recall a previous order dated 14.11.2024 lacks merit. The court rejected the petitioner's arguments regarding the naming and identification of accused persons, holding that the designation of the accused as "unknown No. 34" is legally permissible and the petition should fail accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts