APURV KUMAR ATI vs SHWETAMBER ATI OTHERS — 411/2008
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 13th March 2026 Date Not Updated.
Partion Suit - TITLE PARTITION SUIT
CNR: BREC320000552008
Next Hearing
13th March 2026 Date Not Updated
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
411/2008
Filing Date
03-09-2008
Registration No
411/2008
Registration Date
03-09-2008
Court
Areraj Civil Division
Judge
1-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
APURV KUMAR ATI
Adv. NA
Respondent(s)
SHWETAMBER ATI OTHERS
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 20-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 02-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 19-12-2025 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 07-11-2025 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: Partition Suit No. 411/08 with CIS No. 1135/18 Court: Court of Subordinate Judge, Arrah, East Champaran Date: 09-05-2024 Outcome: The petition for review/reconsideration filed on 01-02-2024 against the order dated 04-01-2024 (regarding appointment of receiver for property) has been rejected/dismissed. The court found that the earlier order appointing a receiver for certain properties was already passed after considering all facts, and a concurrent judgment in a related case (Suit No. 520/08) had already addressed the specific property (Account 169/219, Khata 2041/2042, Plot 0-8-16½ Dhuhr). The court held that challenging the appointment order without fresh evidence or valid grounds was not maintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: Partition Suit No. 411/08 with CIS No. 1135/18 Court: Court of Subordinate Judge, Arrah, East Champaran Date: 09-05-2024 Outcome: The petition for review/reconsideration filed on 01-02-2024 against the order dated 04-01-2024 (regarding appointment of receiver for property) has been rejected/dismissed. The court found that the earlier order appointing a receiver for certain properties was already passed after considering all facts, and a concurrent judgment in a related case (Suit No. 520/08) had already addressed the specific property (Account 169/219, Khata 2041/2042, Plot 0-8-16½ Dhuhr). The court held that challenging the appointment order without fresh evidence or valid grounds was not maintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts