KALIKANT DWIVEDI vs SANTOSH KUMAR CHAUBEY AND OTHER — 13/2018

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

Hearing Next hearing 25-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Title Suit

CNR: BREC320000282018

Filing Number

46/2018

Filing Date

26-Apr-2018

Registration No

13/2018

Registration Date

26-Apr-2018

Court

Areraj Civil Division

Judge

1-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KALIKANT DWIVEDI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANTOSH KUMAR CHAUBEY AND OTHER

Case History

  1. 25-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  4. 06-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  5. 29-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  6. 09-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  7. 30-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  8. 02-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  9. 04-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  10. 26-Mar-2025

    Hearing

  11. 27-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  12. 17-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  13. 19-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  14. 20-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  15. 17-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  16. 19-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  17. 21-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  18. 24-May-2024

    Hearing

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  19. 26-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  20. 23-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  21. 16-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  22. 02-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  23. 05-Jan-2024

    Hearing

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  24. 15-Dec-2023

    OrderView PDF

    The petitioner's application to be made a party to the land dispute case is dismissed. The court found that the petitioner's application lacks sufficient documentary evidence and was filed with considerable delay (over 4 years after the case was filed in 2018). The court rejected the petitioner's claims regarding ownership interest in the disputed property, noting that the sale deeds cited (dated 09.09.2011 and 11.02.2012) were executed by unauthorized persons without consideration, thus conferring no valid title. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  25. 15-Dec-2023

    Hearing

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  26. 02-Dec-2023

    Hearing

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  27. 10-Nov-2023

    Hearing

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  28. 01-Nov-2023

    Hearing

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  29. 17-Oct-2023

    Hearing

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  30. 24-Aug-2023

    Hearing

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  31. 20-Jul-2023

    Hearing

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  32. 21-Jun-2023

    Hearing

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  33. 18-May-2023

    Hearing

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  34. 11-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  35. 15-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  36. 17-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  37. 21-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  38. 05-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  39. 22-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  40. 14-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  41. 04-Jun-2022

    Evidence

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  42. 21-Apr-2022

    Evidence

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  43. 11-Mar-2022

    Evidence

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  44. 09-Feb-2022

    Evidence

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  45. 19-Jan-2022

    Evidence

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  46. 23-Dec-2021

    Evidence

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  47. 02-Dec-2021

    Evidence

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  48. 22-Oct-2021

    Evidence

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  49. 10-Sep-2021

    Evidence

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  50. 06-Aug-2021

    Evidence

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  51. 09-Jul-2021

    Evidence

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  52. 11-Jun-2021

    Evidence

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  53. 07-May-2021

    Evidence

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  54. 15-Apr-2021

    Evidence

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  55. 20-Mar-2021

    Evidence

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  56. 20-Feb-2021

    Evidence

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  57. 23-Jan-2021

    Evidence

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  58. 03-Dec-2020

    Evidence

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  59. 17-Sep-2020

    Evidence

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  60. 30-Jul-2020

    Evidence

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  61. 04-Jun-2020

    Evidence

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  62. 30-Apr-2020

    Evidence

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  63. 26-Mar-2020

    Evidence

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  64. 05-Mar-2020

    Evidence

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  65. 16-Jan-2020

    Evidence

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  66. 10-Jan-2020

    Issues

    Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm

  67. 25-Nov-2019

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  68. 24-Nov-2019

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  69. 23-Aug-2019

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  70. 27-Jun-2019

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  71. 16-May-2019

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  72. 12-Apr-2019

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  73. 07-Mar-2019

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  74. 07-Feb-2019

    Appearence

    Sub Judge

  75. 03-Jan-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  76. 26-Apr-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 13/2018

casestatus.in Summary

The petitioner's application to be made a party to the land dispute case is dismissed. The court found that the petitioner's application lacks sufficient documentary evidence and was filed with considerable delay (over 4 years after the case was filed in 2018). The court rejected the petitioner's claims regarding ownership interest in the disputed property, noting that the sale deeds cited (dated 09.09.2011 and 11.02.2012) were executed by unauthorized persons without consideration, thus conferring no valid title. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case