SAKALDEV RAY vs SURESH YADAV AND OTHER — 9/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BREC320000212018
Filing Number
57/2018
Filing Date
01-Jun-2018
Registration No
9/2018
Registration Date
01-Jun-2018
Court
Areraj Civil Division
Judge
1-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
Last updated 24-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SAKALDEV RAY
Adv. NA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SURESH YADAV AND OTHER
Case History
-
24-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
04-Mar-2026
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
22-Dec-2025
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
14-Oct-2025
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
27-Aug-2025
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
09-Jul-2025
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
28-May-2025
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
09-Apr-2025
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
15-Feb-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
14-Feb-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
10-Jan-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
22-Oct-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
09-Sep-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
29-Jul-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
01-Jul-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
11-Jun-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
27-May-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
01-May-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
22-Apr-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
18-Mar-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
04-Mar-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
27-Jan-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
11-Dec-2023
OrderView PDF
The plaintiff's application to amend the plaint under CPC Order 6 Rule 17 is dismissed/rejected. The court found that while the amendment request appeared to be formal in nature, the case is already five years old with evidence proceedings underway, and allowing such amendments would alter the fundamental nature of the suit. The court held that the plaintiff should have presented the plaint more carefully and with proper diligence from the outset, and therefore the amendment application cannot be permitted at this stage of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Dec-2023
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
28-Nov-2023
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
12-Sep-2023
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
08-Aug-2023
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
10-Jul-2023
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
06-Mar-2023
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
02-Jan-2023
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
05-Dec-2022
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
27-Sep-2022
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
11-Aug-2022
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
04-Jul-2022
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
31-May-2022
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
04-Apr-2022
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
26-Feb-2022
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
11-Feb-2022
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
21-Jan-2022
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
22-Dec-2021
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
01-Dec-2021
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
26-Oct-2021
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
07-Sep-2021
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
27-Jul-2021
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
29-Jun-2021
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
01-Jun-2021
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
27-Apr-2021
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
06-Apr-2021
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
10-Mar-2021
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
23-Feb-2021
Evidence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
23-Jan-2021
Order
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
09-Dec-2020
Order
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
30-Sep-2020
Appearence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
12-Aug-2020
Appearence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
17-Jun-2020
Appearence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
06-May-2020
Appearence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
08-Apr-2020
Appearence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
21-Mar-2020
Appearence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
26-Feb-2020
Appearence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
12-Feb-2020
Appearence
Sub Judge-3-Cum-Acjm
-
16-Dec-2019
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
25-Nov-2019
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
23-Oct-2019
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
22-Oct-2019
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
16-Sep-2019
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
21-Aug-2019
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
18-Jun-2019
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
13-May-2019
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
17-Apr-2019
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
12-Mar-2019
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
05-Feb-2019
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
21-Jan-2019
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
02-Jan-2019
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
10-Dec-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Jun-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 9/2018
The plaintiff's application to amend the plaint under CPC Order 6 Rule 17 is dismissed/rejected. The court found that while the amendment request appeared to be formal in nature, the case is already five years old with evidence proceedings underway, and allowing such amendments would alter the fundamental nature of the suit. The court held that the plaintiff should have presented the plaint more carefully and with proper diligence from the outset, and therefore the amendment application cannot be permitted at this stage of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts