LANGTU MIYAN vs NAYNA KHATUN — 6/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 29th May 2026.
Partion Suit - TITLE PARTITION SUIT
CNR: BREC320000152018
Next Hearing
29th May 2026
Filing Number
2/2018
Filing Date
06-01-2018
Registration No
6/2018
Registration Date
06-01-2018
Court
Areraj Civil Division
Judge
1-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
LANGTU MIYAN
Respondent(s)
NAYNA KHATUN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 12-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 24-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 23-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 19-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
The court allowed the plaintiff's amendment application filed under CPC Order 6 Rule 17, imposing a cost of ₹3,000 to be deposited with the court. The amendments were deemed necessary to clarify the actual disputed issues regarding the contested land and do not materially alter the nature of the suit or cause prejudice to either party. The case, which is 6 years old and has not yet reached the stage of framing issues, is directed to proceed with further proceedings within the prescribed legal timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed the plaintiff's amendment application filed under CPC Order 6 Rule 17, imposing a cost of ₹3,000 to be deposited with the court. The amendments were deemed necessary to clarify the actual disputed issues regarding the contested land and do not materially alter the nature of the suit or cause prejudice to either party. The case, which is 6 years old and has not yet reached the stage of framing issues, is directed to proceed with further proceedings within the prescribed legal timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts