State of Bihar vs AASHA DEVI AND OTHERS — 1551/2016

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,.323,504/34. Status: Appearence. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Appearence Next hearing 12-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CRI. CASE

CNR: BREC110018022016

Filing Number

1551/2016

Filing Date

21-Feb-2014

Registration No

1551/2016

Registration Date

21-Feb-2014

Court

Sikrahna CJM Division

Judge

3-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

13

Police Station

KURWA CHAINPUR

Year

2014

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,.323,504/34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

    Adv. PP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AASHA DEVI AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss

  3. 13-Dec-2025

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss

  4. 14-Nov-2025

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss

  5. 23-Aug-2025

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss

  6. 21-Jun-2025

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss

  7. 11-Apr-2025

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss

  8. 03-Feb-2025

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss

  9. 14-Nov-2024

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss

  10. 06-Sep-2024

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss

  11. 09-Jul-2024

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss

  12. 02-May-2024

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss

  13. 21-Feb-2024

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss

  14. 30-Nov-2023

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss

  15. 12-Sep-2023

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss

  16. 13-Jul-2023

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss

  17. 23-May-2023

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  18. 17-Jan-2023

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  19. 17-Jan-2023

    Restored

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  20. 04-Feb-2020

    Judgment

    Summary: All four accused persons—Jyotnarayan Jha, Asha Devi, Abhimanyu Jha, and Ravi Kumar—were acquitted of charges under IPC sections 323, 341, 504, and 34 for alleged assault and wrongful restraint. The court found insufficient credible evidence as the prosecution produced only two witnesses (one of whom had no knowledge of the occurrence) and failed to examine key witnesses including the informant, investigating officer, and doctor. Their bail bonds were set aside and sureties discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  21. 04-Feb-2020

    Disposed

    Sub Judge-4-Cum-Acjm

  22. 28-Jan-2020

    Arguments

    Sub Judge-4-Cum-Acjm

  23. 20-Jan-2020

    Arguments

    Sub Judge-4-Cum-Acjm

  24. 10-Jan-2020

    Arguments

    Sub Judge-4-Cum-Acjm

  25. 03-Dec-2019

    Arguments

    S.D.J.M.

  26. 21-Nov-2019

    Arguments

    S.D.J.M.

  27. 06-Nov-2019

    Arguments

    S.D.J.M.

  28. 03-Oct-2019

    Arguments

    S.D.J.M.

  29. 16-Sep-2019

    Arguments

    S.D.J.M.

  30. 23-Aug-2019

    Arguments

    S.D.J.M.

  31. 08-Aug-2019

    Arguments

    S.D.J.M.

  32. 12-Jul-2019

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    S.D.J.M.

  33. 07-May-2019

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    S.D.J.M.

  34. 12-Apr-2019

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    S.D.J.M.

  35. 28-Mar-2019

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    S.D.J.M.

  36. 31-Jan-2019

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    S.D.J.M.

  37. 10-Jan-2019

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    S.D.J.M.

  38. 11-Dec-2018

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    S.D.J.M.

  39. 03-Nov-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 21-Feb-2014

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1551/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: All four accused persons—Jyotnarayan Jha, Asha Devi, Abhimanyu Jha, and Ravi Kumar—were acquitted of charges under IPC sections 323, 341, 504, and 34 for alleged assault and wrongful restraint. The court found insufficient credible evidence as the prosecution produced only two witnesses (one of whom had no knowledge of the occurrence) and failed to examine key witnesses including the informant, investigating officer, and doctor. Their bail bonds were set aside and sureties discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case