PINTU RAM ALIAS RAJ KUMAR RANJAN vs State of Bihar — 6024/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BREC010207842025

Filing Number

18986/2025

Filing Date

08-Dec-2025

Registration No

6024/2025

Registration Date

09-Dec-2025

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 5th

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

304

Police Station

RAGHUNATHPUR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PINTU RAM ALIAS RAJ KUMAR RANJAN

    Adv. DR.ADHIR KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order By CourtView PDF

    Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Pintu Ram, who was accused of threatening an informant and demanding extortion of Rs. 50 lakh for soil-filling work on disputed land, under B.N.S. sections 308(3), 308(4), 329(3), and 111. The court found the allegations supported by witness statements and case diary materials, and considered the gravity of the offense, petitioner's prior criminal antecedents, and ongoing investigation as grounds to deny bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 5th

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 5th

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 5th

  6. 02-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 5th

  7. 24-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 5th

  8. 12-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 5th

  9. 24-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 5th

  10. 11-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 5th

  11. 10-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 08-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 6024/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Pintu Ram, who was accused of threatening an informant and demanding extortion of Rs. 50 lakh for soil-filling work on disputed land, under B.N.S. sections 308(3), 308(4), 329(3), and 111. The court found the allegations supported by witness statements and case diary materials, and considered the gravity of the offense, petitioner's prior criminal antecedents, and ongoing investigation as grounds to deny bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case