RANDIR KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 132/2024

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Revision - CRI. REVISION

CNR: BREC010072192024

Filing Number

7216/2024

Filing Date

16-May-2024

Registration No

132/2024

Registration Date

17-May-2024

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

1-Principal District and sessions Judge

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

33M

Police Station

COMPLAINT CASE

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RANDIR KUMAR

    Adv. NAGESHWAR PRASAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Order By CourtView PDF

    Case Summary: Criminal Revision 132/2024 Randhir Kumar v. State of Bihar & Others The Sessions Judge dismissed Randhir Kumar's revision petition challenging the lower court's order dropping Section 144 CrPC proceedings regarding disputed land. The court held that Section 144 CrPC lacks jurisdiction to determine title or possession and that the magistrate's findings exceeded legal authority. The court disposed the revision as infructuous, clarifying that any directions regarding parties' rights in the lower court order shall not create or extinguish any legal rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Hearing On Addmission

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing On Addmission

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    Hearing On Addmission

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  7. 18-Dec-2025

    Hearing On Addmission

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  8. 01-Dec-2025

    Hearing On Addmission

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  9. 12-Nov-2025

    Hearing On Addmission

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  10. 02-Sep-2025

    Hearing On Addmission

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  11. 22-Jul-2025

    Hearing On Addmission

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  12. 03-Jul-2025

    Hearing On Addmission

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  13. 29-May-2025

    Hearing On Addmission

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  14. 23-Apr-2025

    Hearing On Addmission

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  15. 21-Mar-2025

    Hearing On Addmission

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  16. 11-Feb-2025

    Hearing On Addmission

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  17. 28-Jan-2025

    Hearing On Addmission

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  18. 10-Jan-2025

    Hearing On Addmission

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  19. 18-Dec-2024

    Hearing On Addmission

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  20. 04-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  21. 22-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  22. 01-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  23. 10-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  24. 27-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  25. 20-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  26. 20-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  27. 14-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  28. 20-May-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 16-May-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 132/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Revision 132/2024 Randhir Kumar v. State of Bihar & Others The Sessions Judge dismissed Randhir Kumar's revision petition challenging the lower court's order dropping Section 144 CrPC proceedings regarding disputed land. The court held that Section 144 CrPC lacks jurisdiction to determine title or possession and that the magistrate's findings exceeded legal authority. The court disposed the revision as infructuous, clarifying that any directions regarding parties' rights in the lower court order shall not create or extinguish any legal rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case