LALAN PASWAN AND ORS vs State of Bihar — 1602/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BREC010053892026

Filing Number

4999/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

1602/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

14-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 7th

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

350

Police Station

MADHUBAN

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LALAN PASWAN AND ORS

    Adv. SATYAM KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Order By CourtView PDF

    The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by six petitioners (Lalan Paswan and others) accused of kidnapping a 17-year-old girl under the POCSO Act. The court found that the victim's date of birth was 07.02.2008, making her 17 years old at the time of the alleged kidnapping on 27.08.2025, and considered the nature of the allegations serious enough to warrant rejection of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 7th

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 7th

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st

  6. 26-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1602/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by six petitioners (Lalan Paswan and others) accused of kidnapping a 17-year-old girl under the POCSO Act. The court found that the victim's date of birth was 07.02.2008, making her 17 years old at the time of the alleged kidnapping on 27.08.2025, and considered the nature of the allegations serious enough to warrant rejection of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case