SUBODH KUMAR SINGH vs State of Bihar — 728/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 04th April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BREC010049252026

Filing Number

4562/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

728/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

1-Principal District and sessions Judge

Decision Date

04-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 15-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

120

Police Station

PATAHI

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUBODH KUMAR SINGH

    Adv. BACHCHA ANSARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    Order By CourtView PDF

    The Sessions Judge rejected the bail petition of Subodh Kumar Singh, who was accused of obtaining a teacher's position using forged matriculation certificates from Bihar Sanskrit Education Board. The court found that Singh's submitted documents bore roll numbers corresponding to another student and were verified as fake, constituting offences under IPC sections 467, 468, 471, 420, and 120(B), and held that such crimes affecting the educational system warranted no leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 728/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge rejected the bail petition of Subodh Kumar Singh, who was accused of obtaining a teacher's position using forged matriculation certificates from Bihar Sanskrit Education Board. The court found that Singh's submitted documents bore roll numbers corresponding to another student and were verified as fake, constituting offences under IPC sections 467, 468, 471, 420, and 120(B), and held that such crimes affecting the educational system warranted no leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case